"Jan W Nielsen" <intetsvar@nitetsvar.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
news:42dc813f$0$24174$d40e179e@nntp06.dk.telia.net...
>> For øvrigt er her en sammenligning af 325i (192/245) og 330d (184/390).
> Det
>> er ganske sjov læsning.
>
> Fik du hele linket med - jeg kan ikke se, der er nogen side i den anden
> ende..
>
>
>
> /Jan W Nielsen
>
>
>
>
Kan ikke få det til at virke, så here goes:
D-Day
We know BMW's 330d is one of the best diesel-engined cars, but
better than a 325i? As we find out on road and test track, it's a damn
close-run thing. And this is just the start of the performance diesel
revolution
June 2002
BMW 325i v BMW 330d
Yes, this is the thrill of thrills. The tacho needle
nudges 4600rpm as another gear snicks into place to renew the surge of
acceleration, the smooth six-cylinder baritone blaring in exultation. Fat
tyres are biting the tarmacadam as you power'n'torque your way out of a
corner, tail squatting hard as you spear into the next straight. A mighty,
musclebound motor is hauling with relentless pressure on your back, the
clichés are truly flying now... but wait a minute. How many rpm?
This is like one of those scenes that breaks the
spell of an otherwise compelling novel, like normally car-savvy Iain Banks
writing about a Peugeot 209 in The Crow Road, or Arthur Hailey describing in
Wheels how the secret prototype screams up to 85mph. Are we witnessing some
mistake? No, there is no mistake. Instead there is a future, and it's very
probably diesel-powered.
But can diesel ever power a true performance car?
Can it really deliver evoness? As petrol engines become ever softer-edged
under the strictures of Euro 4 emission regs and drive-by-wire throttles,
it's the diesel that emerges from the shadows on a wave of that new
performance provider: torque. BMW's latest 320d delivers 243lb ft of it from
just two litres. And as for the 330d, how does 288lb ft grab you? Quite
hard, when transmitted to your body via a driving seat.
And of course there's the fuel economy, although
this is less of a draw here in the UK than it is elsewhere in Europe thanks
to the cost of the fuel (by far the EU's highest) and a tax penalty both for
the tax disc and company car tax. That penalty is small, though, and even
against these odds the diesel makes monetary sense provided the car doesn't
cost too much more in the first place. But that is just one of the balances
to be struck. In this test, we're balancing another: power.
The green 330d Touring you see here, the car with
the 4600rpm upshift point, delivers 184bhp as well as that torque mountain.
The silver 325i Touring can generate a little more power at 192bhp, but its
torque is 'just' 181lb ft. So, which will be quicker? And which will provide
the richer driving experience?
With similar power, the two Tourings should deliver
similar ultimate pace. So, to cut to the chase of how different the delivery
of that pace might be, we're using five-speed automatic versions of both
cars. That reduces variations in driving technique, and lets us compare the
change-up strategies.
So we're lined up on a straight at the Bedford
Autodrome, John Barker and I, and the drag race is about to begin. We count
down in sync, left feet hard on brake pedals, right feed hard on
accelerators, stalling the torque converters for no more than a couple of
seconds before left-foot-off and blast-off. Traction control systems and
air-conditioning are also off.
The 325i launches itself into the lead, the 330d
still some way off full turbo boost because the engine hasn't been revving
high enough. Then the diesel torque comes flooding in and a second after
standstill it's matching the 325i's now-declining acceleration rate. In
another half-second it's pulling harder than the 325i and will do so up to
30mph. That's where the graphs intersect again, and from that point on the
two cars pile on speed at a near-identical rate.
On the track, this means that the 330d hauls in the
325i and they stay within a length of each other to 60mph. The 325i then
eases ahead a little, but as 100mph approaches the 330d is gaining ground
again as the torque continues its flood. Look at the acceleration table, and
you'll see how closely matched the acceleration rates are. If it wasn't for
the 330d's slight launch delay, if it had reached 30mph in
ADVERTISEMENT
the same time as the 325i (whose 2.96sec time is
pretty special for an automatic), then the 330d would have had its nose in
front all the way to 60mph.
Which means what, exactly, out in the real world of
real roads? The 325i was upshifting at 6300rpm, the 330d at 4600rpm - or
less, in the case of the first-to-second change. One was driven by the power
that high revs produce, the other by the more relaxed power that goes with
ample torque.
So, three litres of common-rail, intercooled
turbodiesel gets you to your destination just as quickly, but rather more
discreetly and less stressfully than 2.5 litres of naturally aspirated,
variably valve-timed petrol engine.
But there's bad stress, and there's exciting stress.
The 325i does all you expect a BMW to do, its engine spinning with the usual
creamy, lightweight note, all preconceptions confirmed including the hunch
that it's going to spend a lot of time in the lower gears when you're
pressing on. It's a busy soundtrack, but it will lift you up not wear you
down. Exciting? Not especially.
Maybe it's torque that adds excitement. So we move
to the 330d, and real pulling power. This is more fun; press the accelerator
and this BMW just thrusts forward, usually without bothering to change down,
because there's no need and the gearbox knows it. And if it does change
down, or you do it yourself with the Steptronic tip-shift, it's smoother
than in the 325i. More urge, less effort. And here's the clincher; the
engine is almost as smooth as the 325i's. It emits hardly any diesel rattle,
and it has a voice. A proper note; deep, authoritative, six-cylinderish.
This is not just a great diesel. It's a great engine.
And the downsides? The 330d costs £2875 more than
the 325i (never mind the test car's optional Sport pack), although it's on a
level with a 330i. It isn't especially economical if driven with gusto:
28.5mpg on test against the 325i's 26.4. And you might expect its heavier
engine to dull the handling, although in reality you can barely feel the
difference.
But this isn't about buying a diesel to save money
and suffer pain. It's about buying a diesel because you'll have more fun
with it. This is the future. Don't worry. It'll be fine.
Words/Pictures: John Simister/Andy Morgan
Comments: 0 Article from: evo
begin 666 1pix.gif
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`(#_`,# P ```"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``
`
end
begin 666 1pix_dpurple.gif
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`( ``#,S9@```"'Y! ``````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``
`
end