"Blur T" <ghettoftwSP@Mgmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
news:488072a2$0$56794$edfadb0f@dtext02.news.tele.dk...
> Microsoft's problem is that they did a great job in getting XP to a 'good
> enough' level. People don't necessarily want 'new' when 'old' gets the job
> done - especially when 'new' means new problems. They're used to XP's
> problems, can work round them - why make them learn new ones? People don't
> like learning curves, they are generally conservative, and why shouldn't
> they be? Why is it so stupid for people to prefer XP, and to grumble about
> having to 'upgrade'?
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Many people prefers XP. A good reson is system ressources. The demand for
those are much greater in Vista. I run Vista for security reasons. In XP a
gangster program can install without the user knowing it. Under Vista any
install has to be admitted by the user.
God bless you and Your XP.
Greets Jens "Lyrik" Bech