/ Forside / Interesser / Dyr / Fugle / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Fugle
#NavnPoint
dova 5097
Nordsted1 1938
katekismus 1408
arne.jako.. 910
CLAN 880
akle 875
HelleBirg.. 800
molokyle 790
piaskov 740
10  jakjoe 695
Willow Warbler
Fra : Beng


Dato : 28-06-05 21:48

Helloooo

For those of you (Tina),, that thinks that I NEVER get a descent pic of a
bird.. see this one :

http://orre.mine.nu/faglar/lovsangare.asp

Thats a..yes..Willow warbler..

//Beng(drunk today..sorry)


 
 
Christina Websell (29-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Christina Websell


Dato : 29-06-05 00:58


"Beng" <xnews88REMOVE@yahoo.se> wrote in message
news:Xns9683E7F93FB30xnews88REMOVEyahoose@130.133.1.4...
> Helloooo
>
> For those of you (Tina),, that thinks that I NEVER get a descent pic of a
> bird.. see this one :
>
> http://orre.mine.nu/faglar/lovsangare.asp
>
> Thats a..yes..Willow warbler..
>
> //Beng(drunk today..sorry)
>
Oh, for goodness sake, Beng, I didn't say anything of the kind. I just
wondered why you didn't use a bird book like most of us do, and just send
pics of the difficult ones if you were really stuck.

Tina
(not drunk)




Andrew McGleish (29-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Andrew McGleish


Dato : 29-06-05 06:43


"Beng" <xnews88REMOVE@yahoo.se> wrote in message
news:Xns9683E7F93FB30xnews88REMOVEyahoose@130.133.1.4...
> Helloooo
>
> http://orre.mine.nu/faglar/lovsangare.asp
>
> Thats a..yes..Willow warbler..
>
great pics... song is definitely Willow Warbler.. but.. and I always have a
problem separating these two by sight... legs appear quite dark... angles on
the photo make this difficult but primary projection looks shorter than the
tertiarys.... you're sure that the bird you photographed is the one who's
singing you recorded?

I do find the discussions your photos provide quite useful because they can
draw out the kind of details that need to be picked out in field notes and
that's always great for helping me learn.

Andrew



Beng (29-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Beng


Dato : 29-06-05 21:05

"Andrew McGleish" <amcgleish.doesnt.dospam@netscape.net> wrote in
news:42c234ff$0$41894$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net:

>
> "Beng" <xnews88REMOVE@yahoo.se> wrote in message
> news:Xns9683E7F93FB30xnews88REMOVEyahoose@130.133.1.4...
>> Helloooo
>>
>> http://orre.mine.nu/faglar/lovsangare.asp
>>
>> Thats a..yes..Willow warbler..
>>
> great pics... song is definitely Willow Warbler.. but.. and I always
> have a problem separating these two by sight... legs appear quite
> dark... angles on the photo make this difficult but primary projection
> looks shorter than the tertiarys.... you're sure that the bird you
> photographed is the one who's singing you recorded?
>
> I do find the discussions your photos provide quite useful because
> they can draw out the kind of details that need to be picked out in
> field notes and that's always great for helping me learn.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>

I'm not sure that the sound is that actual bird.. but I heard it, and it
sounded exactly like a Willow warbler..

That sound is rather easy I think..

//Ben

Andrew McGleish (30-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Andrew McGleish


Dato : 30-06-05 06:50

Beng
The sound is a very good way of telling the difference between Chiffchaff
and Willow Warbler.. but I'm not convinced your photo is of a willow
warbler. Which of the characteristics of the bird did you use to decide? I
never find it easy to tell the difference visually.

Andrew



Beng (30-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Beng


Dato : 30-06-05 16:43

"Andrew McGleish" <amcgleish.doesnt.dospam@netscape.net> wrote in
news:42c38813$0$30820$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net:

> Beng
> The sound is a very good way of telling the difference between
> Chiffchaff and Willow Warbler.. but I'm not convinced your photo is of
> a willow warbler. Which of the characteristics of the bird did you use
> to decide? I never find it easy to tell the difference visually.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>

I used the sound !!

//Ben


Andrew McGleish (30-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Andrew McGleish


Dato : 30-06-05 17:18


"Beng" <xnews88REMOVE@yahoo.se> wrote in message
news:Xns9685B43DD3C6Exnews88REMOVEyahoose@130.133.1.4...

>
> I used the sound !!
>

OK, but since you're not sure it was that actual bird that was singing....
what other characteristics of the bird make you think Willow Warbler and not
Chiffchaff. It's possible there was a WW close by singing it's heart out
exactly as the recording you provided.
Above I've suggested two reason from the photo why I wonder whether it might
be ChiffChaff rather than a Willow Warbler? Anyone else like to comment?

Good fun this eh?

Andrew



Beng (30-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Beng


Dato : 30-06-05 17:29

"Andrew McGleish" <amcgleish.doesnt.dospam@netscape.net> wrote in
news:42c41b3b$0$30836$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net:

>
> "Beng" <xnews88REMOVE@yahoo.se> wrote in message
> news:Xns9685B43DD3C6Exnews88REMOVEyahoose@130.133.1.4...
>
>>
>> I used the sound !!
>>
>
> OK, but since you're not sure it was that actual bird that was
> singing.... what other characteristics of the bird make you think
> Willow Warbler and not Chiffchaff. It's possible there was a WW close
> by singing it's heart out exactly as the recording you provided.
> Above I've suggested two reason from the photo why I wonder whether it
> might be ChiffChaff rather than a Willow Warbler? Anyone else like to
> comment?
>
> Good fun this eh?
>
> Andrew
>
>
>

Well you are right.. I am not 100% sure.. didnt here THAT bird sing..

What make you think its a CC ?

//Ben


Andrew McGleish (30-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Andrew McGleish


Dato : 30-06-05 18:13


"Beng" <xnews88REMOVE@yahoo.se> wrote in message
news:Xns9685BBFAF40FBxnews88REMOVEyahoose@130.133.1.4...


> Well you are right.. I am not 100% sure.. didnt here THAT bird sing..
>
> What make you think its a CC ?
>
> //Ben


Dark legs for CC, light for WW... Also Primary Projection looks shorter. ie
the length in which the primary feathers stick out when the wing's folded is
shorter than that of the secondaries.. although the angle of the photos
makes that difficult to see... Dark legs was the first thing that struck me
from the photos.. I had to go to the books and the dark legs is not 100%
reliable since first winter WW may have dark legs... but this bird is
presumably an adult at this time of year.

Andrew



Jens Mikkel Lausten (30-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Jens Mikkel Lausten


Dato : 30-06-05 19:29

Andrew McGleish wrote:
> "Beng" <xnews88REMOVE@yahoo.se> wrote in message
> news:Xns9685BBFAF40FBxnews88REMOVEyahoose@130.133.1.4...
>
>
>> Well you are right.. I am not 100% sure.. didnt here THAT bird sing..
>>
>> What make you think its a CC ?
>>
>> //Ben
>
>
> Dark legs for CC, light for WW... Also Primary Projection looks
> shorter. ie the length in which the primary feathers stick out when
> the wing's folded is shorter than that of the secondaries.. although
> the angle of the photos makes that difficult to see... Dark legs was
> the first thing that struck me from the photos.. I had to go to the
> books and the dark legs is not 100% reliable since first winter WW
> may have dark legs... but this bird is presumably an adult at this
> time of year.

If its a WW you can't tell if it is a young or an adult. WW's are among the very few birds that undergo two complete moults per year.
I early autum you can age a few old, they start to moult the inner primaries in august. 1st year birds will moult after migration.
If you see a very worn Phylloscopus in midsommer it is most likely a CC.
Legcolors are often to variable to use exept for the extremes. Legcolors on photos are even worse. The bird on the photos seems to have orange (Pic. 1.), then dark blackish legs (Pic. 2-3.).

My best guess will be WW.

Mikkel

Andrew McGleish (02-07-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Andrew McGleish


Dato : 02-07-05 07:25


"Jens Mikkel Lausten" <mlausten@worldonline.dk> wrote in message
news:UQWwe.57673$Fe7.189823@news000.worldonline.dk...



>My best guess will be WW.

>Mikkel

Cheers Mikkel, that's useful

Which characteristics push you towards WW from the Photo?

Andrew



Beng (02-07-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Beng


Dato : 02-07-05 11:16

"Andrew McGleish" <amcgleish.doesnt.dospam@netscape.net> wrote in
news:42c63317$0$17907$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:

>
> "Jens Mikkel Lausten" <mlausten@worldonline.dk> wrote in message
> news:UQWwe.57673$Fe7.189823@news000.worldonline.dk...
>
>
>
>>My best guess will be WW.
>
>>Mikkel
>
> Cheers Mikkel, that's useful
>
> Which characteristics push you towards WW from the Photo?
>
> Andrew
>
>
>

This WW/CC-thing has to stop NOW !.. There were 3-4 birds.. each of them
sounding like WW.. noone sounded like CC.. so it IS a WW !

//Beng


Andrew McGleish (02-07-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Andrew McGleish


Dato : 02-07-05 13:46


"Beng" <xnews88REMOVE@yahoo.se> wrote in message
news:Xns96877CBA435A8xnews88REMOVEyahoose@130.133.1.4...
>>
> This WW/CC-thing has to stop NOW !.. There were 3-4 birds.. each of them
> sounding like WW.. noone sounded like CC.. so it IS a WW !
>
> //Beng


Beng
welcome to the internet and to birdwatching.

You don't own this discussion so you can't tell anyone to stop. You've not
given any reason to identify the bird, other than the song, which you admit
might not have been from the bird in the photo, so excuse me if I don't
blindly take your word for the identification. The song is the only easy way
I know to tell the difference between CC and WW. The next feature I've
picked up from books is the leg colour, but that has been called into
question.

I'm carrying on this discussion because I want to learn a bit more about
separating the two species, I don't really care whether or not you want to
learn or whether all you want is a tick on a list. If the world expert on
Phylloscopus species came here and pronounced, I would still ask why... not
as a challenge to his manhood or her ego but as an aid to my learning... So
Mikkel, Phil point me in the direction please?

Andrew



Phil Wilson (02-07-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Phil Wilson


Dato : 02-07-05 15:43

Andrew McGleish wrote:

> I'm carrying on this discussion because I want to learn a bit more
> about separating the two species, I don't really care whether or not
> you want to learn or whether all you want is a tick on a list. If
> the
> world expert on Phylloscopus species came here and pronounced, I
> would still ask why... not as a challenge to his manhood or her ego
> but as an aid to my learning... So Mikkel, Phil point me in the
> direction please?

It was mainly a question of jizz and colouration for me.The angle at
which it has been photographed is one of the more difficult ones. In
general, because of their longer primary projection, Willow Warblers
to me have a more attenuated, elegant look than Chiffchaff, which can
look dumpy and dowdy. Generally Chiffchaff looks rounder-headed and
shorter-billed adding to its compact appearance, and of course the
colouration is often rather drabber and browner (although one has to
be careful of moulting Willow adults - the classic bright
yellowish-green WWs of late summer are in fact immature. Adult Willows
can look very greyish and washed-out in summer). In the present case
the pronounced primrose-yellowish tinge and soft grey-green, the
apparently longer primaries, the yellow-toned ,also quite bright,
eyestripe, longer bill and flatter-looking head and generally elegant
appearance made me go for Willow instead of Chiffchaff. Also the legs
are convincingly light.

Another feature that was mentioned in a previous jog round this topic
was that Chiffchaffs routinely flick their wings.

I have also found that Willow Warblers chase other passerines more
regularly than Chiffchaffs do (quite aggressively in fact), and favour
on the whole locations nearer ground level for feeding and singing.

Disclaimer: I am no expert on this or anything else.

Cheers,

Phil


Andrew McGleish (02-07-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Andrew McGleish


Dato : 02-07-05 19:07


"Phil Wilson" <philip.wilson@talk21.com> wrote in message
news:42c6a7db$0$18637$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...

>
> It was mainly a question of jizz and colouration for me.The angle at which
> it has been photographed is one of the more difficult ones. In general,
> because of their longer primary projection, Willow Warblers to me have a
> more attenuated, elegant look than Chiffchaff, which can look dumpy and
> dowdy. Generally Chiffchaff looks rounder-headed and shorter-billed adding
> to its compact appearance, and of course the colouration is often rather
> drabber and browner (although one has to be careful of moulting Willow
> adults - the classic bright yellowish-green WWs of late summer are in fact
> immature. Adult Willows can look very greyish and washed-out in summer).
> In the present case the pronounced primrose-yellowish tinge and soft
> grey-green, the apparently longer primaries, the yellow-toned ,also quite
> bright, eyestripe, longer bill and flatter-looking head and generally
> elegant appearance made me go for Willow instead of Chiffchaff. Also the
> legs are convincingly light.
>
> Another feature that was mentioned in a previous jog round this topic was
> that Chiffchaffs routinely flick their wings.
>
> I have also found that Willow Warblers chase other passerines more
> regularly than Chiffchaffs do (quite aggressively in fact), and favour on
> the whole locations nearer ground level for feeding and singing.
>
> Disclaimer: I am no expert on this or anything else.


Thanks Phil, very useful. thought the legs looked dark though... Lots of WW
and CC with us just now so I'll do a bit of work with this tomorrow.

Cheers

Andrew



Bill Alexander (02-07-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Bill Alexander


Dato : 02-07-05 21:16


"Andrew McGleish" <amcgleish.doesnt.dospam@netscape.net> wrote in
message
news:42c6d7b7$0$2023$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
>
> "Phil Wilson" <philip.wilson@talk21.com> wrote in message
> news:42c6a7db$0$18637$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
>
>>
>> It was mainly a question of jizz and colouration for me.The
>> angle at which it has been photographed is one of the more
>> difficult ones. In general, because of their longer primary
>> projection, Willow Warblers to me have a more attenuated,
>> elegant look than Chiffchaff, which can look dumpy and dowdy.
>> Generally Chiffchaff looks rounder-headed and shorter-billed
>> adding to its compact appearance, and of course the
>> colouration is often rather drabber and browner (although one
>> has to be careful of moulting Willow adults - the classic
>> bright yellowish-green WWs of late summer are in fact
>> immature. Adult Willows can look very greyish and washed-out
>> in summer). In the present case the pronounced
>> primrose-yellowish tinge and soft grey-green, the apparently
>> longer primaries, the yellow-toned ,also quite bright,
>> eyestripe, longer bill and flatter-looking head and generally
>> elegant appearance made me go for Willow instead of
>> Chiffchaff. Also the legs are convincingly light.
>>
>> Another feature that was mentioned in a previous jog round
>> this topic was that Chiffchaffs routinely flick their wings.
>>
>> I have also found that Willow Warblers chase other passerines
>> more regularly than Chiffchaffs do (quite aggressively in
>> fact), and favour on the whole locations nearer ground level
>> for feeding and singing.
>>
>> Disclaimer: I am no expert on this or anything else.
>
>
> Thanks Phil, very useful. thought the legs looked dark
> though... Lots of WW and CC with us just now so I'll do a bit
> of work with this tomorrow.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andrew
Ok guys please remember...location...location.
This was photographed in the north of God's country
So you are comparing acredula & abietinus of which I have ringed
1 or 2.
Without biometrics and song I would not normally attempt to
separate them...though....though... looking at the bottom picture
I would say the wing is longer and pointed
So I go for Lövsångare in fact looking at it again I would stake
a few öre on it
Bill....



Phil Wilson (02-07-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Phil Wilson


Dato : 02-07-05 22:23

Bill Alexander wrote:
> Ok guys please remember...location...location.
> This was photographed in the north of God's country
> So you are comparing acredula & abietinus of which I have ringed
> 1 or 2.
> Without biometrics and song I would not normally attempt to
> separate them...though....though... looking at the bottom picture
> I would say the wing is longer and pointed
> So I go for Lövsångare in fact looking at it again I would stake
> a few öre on it

Well, quite. I answered completely ignoring the fact of geography (for
which I suppose one has to be thankful that I didn't ramble on for
twice as long). In fact in Aberdeenshire (puzzlingly due for a 'sand
storm' next week according to the BBC weather site (?!) ) some WWs are
of a 'northern' grey type (without being treated as being certainly of
any northern race as far as I know). I must say though that the bird
in question doesn't look noticeably different in colouration to most
of the WWs I've seen here. So my remarks should be understood in a
British context overall.

Cheers,

Phil



Jens Mikkel Lausten (29-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Jens Mikkel Lausten


Dato : 29-06-05 09:40

Beng wrote:
> Helloooo
>
> For those of you (Tina),, that thinks that I NEVER get a descent pic
> of a bird.. see this one :
>
> http://orre.mine.nu/faglar/lovsangare.asp
>
> Thats a..yes..Willow warbler..
>
Hello Beng

What species do map no. 2. (right) represent ?

Not Willow Warbler i think, could it be Chifchaf ??

Mikkel

Jens Mikkel Lausten (29-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Jens Mikkel Lausten


Dato : 29-06-05 10:23

Jens Mikkel Lausten wrote:
> Beng wrote:
>> Helloooo
>>
>> For those of you (Tina),, that thinks that I NEVER get a descent pic
>> of a bird.. see this one :
>>
>> http://orre.mine.nu/faglar/lovsangare.asp
>>
>> Thats a..yes..Willow warbler..
>>
> Hello Beng
>
> What species do map no. 2. (right) represent ?
>
> Not Willow Warbler i think, could it be Chifchaf ??
>
Stupid me, must be map explanation.

Mikkel


Beng (29-06-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Beng


Dato : 29-06-05 21:03

"Jens Mikkel Lausten" <mlausten@worldonline.dk> wrote in
news:K6twe.57476$Fe7.189354@news000.worldonline.dk:

> Beng wrote:
>> Helloooo
>>
>> For those of you (Tina),, that thinks that I NEVER get a descent pic
>> of a bird.. see this one :
>>
>> http://orre.mine.nu/faglar/lovsangare.asp
>>
>> Thats a..yes..Willow warbler..
>>
> Hello Beng
>
> What species do map no. 2. (right) represent ?
>
> Not Willow Warbler i think, could it be Chifchaf ??
>
> Mikkel
>

Hmm.. the right map explains the colors for the left map.. the MEANING
of the colors..

//Ben

Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177558
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408914
Brugere : 218888

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste