>
http://www4.tomshardware.com/display/20030626/lcd-05.html
> "16 ms: Beware!
>
> When we tested the first monitors of this kind, the Iiyama AS4314UTG and
> Hitachi CML174SXW, we were surprised to find much less afterglow on the
> 20-ms monitor than on the 16-ms. We have gone into this matter since then,
> and it turns out that the term 16 ms is exaggerated. 16 ms (max.) would be
> more accurate. If the manufacturers were really frank about this, they
would
> indicate that 16-ms panels only display 262,000 colors instead of the
usual
> 16 million. In fact, AU Optronics uses its extra fast response time to
> display 16 million colors in the end. With luck, the color your game needs
> will be one of the 262,000available to start with and, if so, the response
> time actually will be 16 ms.
>
> But if the color is not in the 262,000 table, the panel will display the
two
> closest shades alternately. Because the display is very fast, your eye
will
> only detect one shade, the right one. But for you to see an image, the
> monitor has to draw two of them. (AU Optronics has confirmed this.) "
Så vidt jeg ved viser alle TFT skærme på markedet i dag "kun" 18-bit farver
= 262143 farver, så det er der ikke noget nyt i, og så vidt jeg husker har
det været diskuteret her i gruppen før. Der blev det også diskuteret om man,
på fx en bærbar, kunne se forskel på 16-bit og 18-bit, og det kan man både
teoretisk og i virkeligheden. 65535 farver mod 262143 farver kan man godt se
forskel på.
Zulu