---

How Journalists MAKE (not you, of course, but others) Annoyed and
Nauseatingly Irrational: by Violating the Definition of Truth

26 October 2008
{HRI 20081026-V2.0}

(Version 2.0
on 27 Oct 2008)

(education)

'

Almost all conditions resolve, by looking at the INTENTION and whose
- which INDIVIDUAL's - INTENTION it is, that causes or caused the
condition(s).

Instead, you are taught, in school etc., 'what
happened:'

The First World War "happened," the Second
World War "happened," and the Holocaust
simply "happened."

The major parts of Truth (parts 1. and 2.,
given below) are not mentioned anymore.

This made you into a moron, and so some
people start to study BY THEMSELVES,

in order to remedy the 'moronification'
inflicted upon them in schools and
colleges and universities. *(a)

'

It applies to all subjects taught, not just to
history. ALL subjects are falsely taught by
omitting the INTENTIONS in it and who had
these.

This applies to any science, to the
arts, to music, medicine, philosophy,
technology, politics, economy, media,
religion, etc..

'

Intelligence has two major parts:

1. The ability to connect to data,

2. The ability to differentiate or separate
those data.

The, of course by far most important part,
'The ability to connect to data' (1.), is
deliberately and maliciously omitted from
the definition of Intelligence,

so that "sciences" like physics and
medicine, since almost a century or so,
are not even worthy of being called
science anymore - to mention only two
subjects.

'

'

'

Truth is:

1. What INTENTION,

2. WHO caused it,

3. What happened. {definition}

'

THE journalists reverse that, and then they even cut that very short,
to report only

3. 'what happened,'

and they often leave out 2. 'Who caused it,'

or they replace it with some INTENTIONALLY debilitating
generality, like

"The United Nations reported ... " or "Russia wants ... ,"

and then

- in order to fixate, to solidify the lies that follow -

they almost always REFUSE to report THE ACTUAL INTENTIONS behind the
reported data,

1. What is the actual INTENTION,

and they replace that, with the most debilitating "reasons,"

that they either thought up themselves, or were given to
relay, in order to hide the actual intentions, hidden for
instance with:

"'Russia' has to defend itself from 'the aggression by Georgia'."

That is not mentioning the actual intentions, of course,
which are:

Russia (Putin) INTENDED for years, and he INTENDS
to impose dictatorship and criminality upon all of
Georgia,

and opposing his INTENTION, is, that

Georgia (Saakashvili) INTENDED to protect Georgian
citizens from the constant criminality enforced and
organized and paid for by Russia, inside Georgia's
territory.

'

Another example:

"'China' considers Taiwan a part of itself to be taken back."

The Chinese "government" (Hu Jintao, Jiang Zemin)

- in order to distract from its own severe and
rampant criminality inflicted continuously

(as "the 'democratic' dictatorship of the
people," that "liberated them" ...from
responsible managers, replaced by thugs
like Mao Zedong dominating them and
inflicting criminality)

upon its own citizens -

wants to make trouble for people elsewhere too, and the
nearest is Taiwan, and their "claim" is "legal."

The intention of the Taiwanese people is quite the
opposite:

The general Taiwanese population intends to be free of
dictatorship, and to keep its citizens free of oppression,
and to have their companies lead by the best managers.

'

But you are TOLD, by THE journalists, persistently even, that

"Russia had to and has to continue to defend itself from
the aggression by Georgia,"

and that

"China considers Taiwan a part of it, to be taken back by
force."

I call that - and THE journalists, and you for
swallowing it - NAUSEATINGLY, repulsively,
destructively Insane,

and I call it war mongering BY THE JOURNALISTS,
FOR REFUSING TO STATE THE TRUTH.

'

'

Truth is:

1. What is the actual INTENTION, not the pretended intention,
but what are the actual intentions,

a journalist who writes that, is very readable, and
very, very valuable indeed; and he will write also

2. WHO caused it,

3. What happened.

'

'

The first and main thing you have to know or find out, about ANY data
presented to you:

WHAT IS ITS INTENTION.

What is the intention of the person originating the data and his
intention for getting it relayed to you.

I wrote a very important conclusion, about that, for you,
which tells you to look for, to keep your eyes open for,
to investigate

that what is NOT being SAID, and what is NOT being
DONE,

that however would be normally expected to be said
or done, in the light of someone's STATED purpose
for his position or activity.

What is your local 'Cancer Society' NOT saying
and what is the World Health Organization NOT
talking about?

You should also keep in mind, that 'Criminal Minds have
everything in reverse:'

They have EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE purpose of what they
STATE and claim, that "they have and work for,"

as you see most obviously in politics with Castro
(Cuba's demise) and Chavez (turning Venezuela into
a fascistic, militant version of Cuba).

'

'

As soon as I do know the INTENTION, then I immediately can place and
understand and evaluate THE DATA PRESENTED, and can assign its
correct importance.

'

'

'

This is not hard to understand. Yet THE JOURNALISTS,

"because they are doubting their own Sanity in determining
another's purpose or actual INTENTIONS,"

SO THEY SAY, but actually,

out of simple professional malice and cowardice, that they - as
Associated Parrots - either originate themselves, or malice and
cowardice that they agree with, or allow, (they)

REFUSE TO REPORT THE INTENTIONS behind the data presented:

"It is a sign of unprofessionalism, to report the INTENTION
behind the data presented."

That's how much journalism has been 'taken over' by
Criminal Minds.

Or in another example: That's how much the judiciary, the
legal people, have been 'taken over' by Criminal Minds.

While Justice is IN THE FIRST PLACE a matter of
establishing the INTENTIONS present, it is so, that

the Criminal Mind tries to win, with DATA that are
deliberately - and indeed maliciously - DISCONNECTED
from the intentions that go with it.

Which is the basis upon which writers earn
their living with countless 'Detective
stories.'

And Criminal Minds manage to obtain false
convictions and evil court sentences

"based on the data presented," and "by following
court procedures,"

because a judge refuses to know the Definition of
Truth. *(nn)

According to the Definition of Justice, establish Truth - defined
correctly - brings about happiness all around, as I do to you.

'

Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
human rights philosopher and poet

'The whole world
sought audience with Solomon
to hear the wisdom
God had put in his heart.'

1 Kings 10:24

'

________
Textnote:

(a) There then seem to be two conditions in which it is possible to
graduate from a school, a college or a university, that is, to
not leave it prematurely to pursue a saner course of educating
oneself about life and people:

EITHER one is by nature, or has allowed oneself to be made into,
a moron

(as is the wont of all who are born to start a new life
on Earth: You are first treated like a moronic baby, then
as a moronic toddler, and so on up

- to fulfill expectations of the Criminal Minds instilled
in society, as to "what is your nature" - )

and then one graduates

- without being aware of one's own condition, nor having
it pointed out, quite the contrary, one is praised "for
being so intelligent" -

as a moron, upholding the pretense of "being taught about life
and people, and about the society and its sciences," graduating
maybe with very high grades, high honors, 'summa cum laude,'

yes, even with a Nobel Prize, often bestowed on such
individuals, lying in wait in one's future,

OR one graduates BECAUSE one has a very high TOLERANCE FOR (the)
Insanity (inflicted upon oneself and all others, in those
institutes of learning) - exerting one's tolerance in proportion
to the Insanity inflicted, proportional to the amount and the
intensity and the insidiousness of it.

I point this out, so that you may study what actually is
Insanity, and what actually is Sanity, and what is Truth

- now that all are defined as these are within your soul -

for the first time defined correctly with the Human Rights
Issues.
'

_________
Footnotes:

(as indicated)

__________
References:

(as applicable)

____________
Verification:

      http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2008 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it (but not to sociopaths,
who vehemently oppose any true knowledge of life and of themselves).
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific 'agenda,' but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com