---

THE LAST LINE OF DEFENCE, IRISH ARE ALL THAT STAND BETWEEN A FREE
CHRISTIAN EUROPE AND A TOTALITARIAN EU SUPERSTATE - AND, ALREADY,
THERE'S ELITE TREACHERY IN THE AIR! 'Today Ireland Has A Chance To
Change Europe's Direction' - 'Ireland Should Vote No To EU Treaty' -
'Today All Europe Looks To Ireland' – '8 Reasons To Vote No To Lisbon'
- ‘This Is The Only Way To Ensure We Have A Say In Our Future’ - 'No
One's Had More From The EU Than The Irish. So Why Have So Many Of Them
Turned Against Brussels?' - A 'NO' Win? Irish And EU Politicians
Reportedly Already Have A Secret Plan To Try To Screw Ireland's
Voters!

- o O o -

Today Ireland Has A Chance To Change Europe's Direction

The European elites are in a panic about the Irish referendum, which
is shining a light on what they're actually up to

Seumas Milne,
The Guardian,
Thursday June 12 2008.

Fear is stalking Europe's chancelleries and boardrooms. There is
bewilderment in Brussels and dismay in Dublin. Against all protocol
and best practice, the people of Ireland have been given a free vote
today on whether to accept a further centralisation of power and
entrenchment of corporate privilege in the European Union. There are
few things that make the blood of EU officials run as cold as the
prospect of a referendum. But not only do the Republic of Ireland's
three million voters have a chance to do what has been denied to the
rest of the union's 490 million people and have their say on the
laboriously constructed Lisbon treaty, alias the European
constitution: the signs are that they might even throw it out - and
sink the entire package for Europe as a whole.

Naturally, the Irish establishment has closed ranks and threatened the
most dire consequences if Ireland dares to vote no. The new Irish
prime minister, Brian Cowen, backed by all the main political parties
and business barons, warned it would put the country's economic future
at risk; the former Irish EU commissioner Peter Sutherland, who now
chairs BP and Goldman Sachs International, said the consequences of a
no vote would be "devastating"; the French foreign minister, Bernard
Kouchner, declared that the Irish would be the "first victims" if they
voted the wrong way. And as the first poll to show the no campaign in
the lead was released last week, the bullying and scaremongering was
ratcheted sharply upwards.

The fact is that Europe's political and business elite avoids giving
voters a direct say wherever possible - because it knows it is likely
to be turned over by a public that regards EU institutions as remote
and unaccountable, whatever it feels about European integration in
principle. The long-established practice has therefore been that
whenever a referendum becomes absolutely unavoidable and the voters
get the answer wrong, they are made to go back and vote again until
they get it right. That was what happened to Denmark over the
Maastricht treaty in 1992, and Ireland when it rejected the Nice
treaty in 2001.

Alternatively, Europe's rulers find a cunning way round whatever the
voters have decided. That is what they thought they had done with the
European constitution after France and the Netherlands voted it down
three years ago. The name was changed, its provisions were turned into
a series of opaque amendments to existing treaties, but in almost all
other respects, the rejected constitution became the Lisbon treaty
intact. The British government was miraculously released from its
unwinnable referendum commitment and, as the constitution's main
author and former French president, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, happily
predicted: "Public opinion will be led to adopt, without knowing it,
the proposals that we dare not present to them directly."

The transparent subterfuge was, in the words of Green MEP Caroline
Lucas, a "demonstration of breathtaking arrogance". But it now risks
coming apart at the hands of a hotchpotch coalition of trade
unionists, nationalists, Catholics, farmers and the obligatory
maverick businessman - opposed to everything from a loss of influence
for small states, social dumping and privatisation, common corporate
tax rates and the militarisation of Europe. Meanwhile, the Irish
government is trying hard to avoid debating the issues, which it seems
to regard as no business of the voters. As Sinn Féin president Gerry
Adams said in Dublin this week, Cowen's administration had been
"unable to explain how the loss of vetoes, opening of health and
education to competition and undermining of workers' pay and
conditions could be a good thing".

No wonder it's been struggling. But given the way debate about Europe
has been framed in Britain over the past couple of decades, such
issues have barely registered in London either. Criticism of the EU
has been almost entirely dominated by a chauvinistic Euroscepticism
that portrays all European politics through the absurd prism of
outraged national identity and anticompetitive regulation. In reality,
far from defending national or democratic sovereignty, the phoney
patriots of the Tory right and the Murdoch press are determined to see
the country further subordinated to the US and the City of London.

The terms of that debate will have to change if the creeping loss of
democratic control and entrenchment of neoliberal orthodoxy in the
Lisbon treaty is to be reversed. Not only does the treaty concentrate
power still further in the commission and council, it effectively
makes the liberalisation and privatisation of public services a
constitutional goal, opens up transport and energy to enforced private
competition, requires member states to boost their "military
capabilities", and sharply increases the powers of the European court
of justice.

What that is likely to mean in practice can be seen from an
extraordinary series of recent court decisions, which have effectively
outlawed the right to strike where unions are trying to win equal pay
for migrant workers and banned public bodies from requiring foreign
contractors to pay such workers local rates. By doing so, the court
has ruled that market freedoms are superior to the "fundamental
rights" used to sell the Lisbon treaty to supporters of a social
Europe. The impact has already been felt in Britain, where the pilots'
union was forced to abandon a strike at British Airways last month
after its legality was challenged under EU law.

Naturally, neither Britain's rightwing Eurosceptics - nor the
government, for that matter - are bothered about the loss of these
basic rights or the breakup of public services being driven from
Brussels. On the contrary, Britain's perennial role in resisting the
kind of modest employment protection that has come out of Europe -
along with the hope that Europe might eventually become a
counterweight to the US - has convinced many progressive-minded people
to cling to the Brussels agenda.

But subordination to the US or an undemocratic neoliberal superstate
is no choice at all. Instead, political alliances need to be
constructed for a different kind of Europe. If Irish voters are
intimidated into backing the treaty today, public alienation from the
EU will continue to grow, along with rightwing nationalism. But if
they manage to boot it out, they could help kickstart the essential
process of change and give a voice to millions across the continent.

s.milne@guardian.co.uk

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jun/12/ireland.eu

- o O o -

Ireland Should Vote No To EU Treaty

Daily Telegraph, UK,
12 June, 2008.

As the only EU country to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty,
Ireland today carries the can for the cowardly evasions of its
partners.

Six years ago, work began on a constitution designed, in a bitter
irony, to bring the union closer to the people. When that was rejected
by French and Dutch voters in 2005, the EU, in time-honoured fashion,
refused to take no for an answer and drew up an amending treaty in
which the substance of the constitution was preserved but the need for
further referenda minimised.

It was on that specious distinction that the Labour Party, having
promised a referendum in its 2005 manifesto, wriggled out of an
exercise in direct democracy that promised certain defeat.

Instead, ratification is taking place through parliaments, except in
Ireland, which is constitutionally bound to a referendum.

Irish voters sceptical about the treaty have been threatened by the
Fianna Fáil-led coalition under Brian Cowen and by the European
Commission about the consequences of rejection. Because other
countries have funked consulting the electorate, they face having to
bear the brunt of official censure.

If the result is no, the EU may hesitate, following the French and
Dutch vetoes, to re-submit the Lisbon Treaty to Irish voters (a tactic
employed with the Nice Treaty in 2001). However, it can be expected
largely to cushion the blow of rejection by implementing treaty
provisions through intergovernmental agreement.

advertisementDespite this haughty disregard of opposition to what is
in all but name a rehashed constitution, it is important for the
future of European democracy that the Irish vote no. Rejection will
further expose the profoundly dirigiste nature of the EU.

And that will hasten the day when the electorate, not least in
Britain, finally slams the brakes on the apparently irreversible drive
towards ever greater union.

("Telegraph view" is written by our team of leader writers and
commentators. This team includes David Hughes, Philip Johnston, Simon
Heffer, Janet Daley, Con Coughlin, Robert Colvile, Iain Martin and
Alex Singleton)

Source:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/
2008/06/12/dl1202.xml

- o O o -

Today All Europe Looks To Ireland

Daily Mail, UK,
12th June, 2008.

By an extraordinary quirk of history, the fate of 500 million
Europeans and 27 nation states lies today in the hands of the voters
of one small country with a population half the size of London's.

Alone among the peoples of the EU, the Irish are being asked to vote
on the Lisbon Treaty - not because their politicians have any more
respect for them than ours have for us, but because they are bound by
their constitution to call a referendum.

No such luck for the British. We could rely only on our politicians'
word of honour that they would give us our say. We all know where that
got us.

Although all three main parties unequivocally promised a referendum on
the new European Constitution in their election manifestos, only the
Tories have voted according to their word.

It's a story of deceit and betrayal that brings shame on our rulers
and shakes our faith in British democracy.

For Labour, first Tony Blair then Gordon Brown broke their solemn
promise, spreading the blatant lie that the Treaty is substantially
different from the draft constitution rejected by Dutch and French
voters in 2005.

The truth (as most European leaders cheerfully boast) is that it's
identical in almost every particular - from appointing a full-time
EU president and foreign minister to the wholesale abolition of
national vetoes and the creation of a shared defence and foreign
policy.

Crucially, the Treaty also establishes the EU as an independent legal
entity, with the power to amend its own rules and sign treaties in its
own right, without reference to national parliaments.

Indeed, it's no exaggeration to say that Lisbon takes a cudgel to our
sovereignty and our right to choose who governs us.

But no. Every Labour MP who promised to back a referendum, and then
voted against one, has colluded in the shabby and shameless lie that
this is nothing more than a 'tidying-up exercise'.

The Lib Dems are no less contemptible. First, they abstained in the
Commons, despite their pledge that 'ratification must be subject to a
referendum of the British people'.

Then last night in the Lords, they joined Labour in crushing all hopes
of a referendum.

So now only Ireland stands between a proper rethink of the Treaty and
the empire-building ambitions of the anti-democratic, expenses-
fiddling, systemically corrupt Eurocrats aboard the Brussels gravy
train.

Don't hold your breath. But if the Irish vote No today, all freedom-
loving Europeans will have cause to raise a grateful glass of the
black stuff in their honour.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1025881/MAIL-COMMENT-Today-Europe-looks-Ireland.html

- o O o -

8 Reasons To Vote No To Lisbon

Free-Europe.org,
6 June, 2008.

1. Creates an unelected President and a Foreign Minister of Europe

The new President and Foreign Minister for Europe will be appointed by
the European Council by qualified majority vote. Although many of the
terms and conditions of these roles have yet to be decided, they will
be committed through the Lisbon Treaty to “drive forward” the agenda
of the Council and discussions have already taken place to provide a
presidential palace and executive jet for the President.

2. Halves Ireland’s voting weight while doubling Germany’s

The Lisbon Treaty would implement a new system of voting by the
European Council which is primarily based on population size. This
means that Ireland’s voting weight would be reduced from 2% at present
to 0.8% if the Treaty was implemented, while Germany’s would increase
from 8% to 17%.

3. Abolishes Ireland’s Commissioner for five years at a time

The Lisbon Treaty proposes to reduce the number of Commissioners to
two thirds of the number of member states. This would mean that, on a
rotating basis, Ireland would have no seat for five years out of every
15 in the body that has the monopoly on initiating legislation. This
would clearly affect a small country like Ireland to a far greater
extent than, for example, Germany which is having its voting weight
doubled under the Treaty.

4. Opens the door to interference in tax and other key economic
interests

Article 113 of the Lisbon Treaty specifically inserts a new obligation
on the European Council to act to avoid “distortion of competition” in
respect of indirect taxes. The proposals for a common consolidated tax
base and the commitment of the French government to pursue it combined
with a weakening of Ireland’s voice in Europe through the loss of a
permanent Commissioner and halving of its voting weight represent a
clear and present danger to our tax competitiveness.

5. Hands over power in 60 areas of decision making to Brussels

The Lisbon Treaty provides for more than 60 areas of decision making
from unanimity at present to qualified majority voting. Some of those
areas include decision-making on immigration, sport, culture,
transport and the appointment of the European President and Foreign
Minister.

6. Gives exclusive competence to Brussels over International Trade and
Foreign Direct Investment

For the first time, under the Lisbon Treaty foreign direct investment
would become an exclusive competence of the EU as part of its common
commercial policy. This means that the tools which have been used so
successfully by the IDA to attract tens of thousands of jobs to
Ireland will become the sole preserve of the European Union and the
Irish Government will have to seek permissions

7. Enshrines EU law as superior to Irish law

On June 12th we will be voting on the 28th amendment to the Irish
Constitution which clearly restates the following:

11° No provision of this Constitution invalidates laws enacted, acts
done or measures adopted by the State that are necessitated by the
obligations of membership of the European Union referred to in
subsection 10° of this section, or prevents laws enacted, acts done or
measures adopted by the said European Union or by institutions
thereof, or by bodies competent under the treaties referred to in this
section, from having the force of law in the State.”

8. The Treaty can be changed without another referendum

Article 48 of the Treaty enables changes to be made to it after
ratification without the constitutional requirement for another
referendum in Ireland. This is confirmed by the independent Referendum
Commission on its website which states: there “may” be a requirement
for a referendum to implement such changes.

(This article first appeared on Libertas.org)

Source: http://www.free-europe.org/blog/english.php?itemid=451

- o O o

This Is The Only Way To Ensure We Have A Say In Our Future

Analysis,
The Irish Independent,
Thursday, June 12, 2008.

A victory for the 'No' Side in today's referendum will establish a
bond between the Irish people and the men and women -- the ordinary
voters -- in the 26 other countries that make up the European Union.
It will be a bond grounded in our respect for democracy, which we
should believe they have a right to share, a right that has been
denied them.

Our view is, or should be, that the 500 million voters in the European
Union deserve to have a real say in the way they are governed, better
than the one offered in the Lisbon Treaty.

We should demonstrate this by rejecting -- on our own and their behalf
-- the extraordinary web of deceit those in power have woven around
this treaty. Those who originally signed it had not read it. Those who
have tried to sell it to the Irish people have represented it quite
falsely and have pilloried as dishonest the case put for rejection.

We should emphatically reject the cut in our power. This will result
from the removal of a representative voice on the European Commission
for five years out of every 15 years, coupled with the fact that our
right to decide who that Irish commissioner is -- when we have one --
has been removed. We can now only 'suggest' who it should be. The new
commission president will decide it.

It is in fact much worse than that. Historically, we always chose our
commissioner. They have been men of calibre and independence of
thought, from Paddy Hillery to Peter Sutherland to Charlie McCreevy.
After the Lisbon Treaty, the new commission president will not only
make the final choice but will also make the final decision on their
responsibilities, giving them their jobs.

If we say 'No' we frustrate this approach. Instead, we keep in place
unanimity in deciding how many commissioners there will be. And all 29
countries want a commissioner. We surrender our agreement to that if
we Vote 'Yes' -- and in doing so we surrender the agreement of the
other states whether they like it or not.

We should not hand over these measures of power, nor should we
surrender the power to make law. That right in any democracy has
always belonged to the people. On a vast range of issues it now moves
to Brussels. Together with it goes the European people's say in
choosing a European president.

We should demonstrate by a 'No' vote that our citizenship of Ireland
-- and the citizenships of every other country in the European Union
-- should not be fundamentally altered by the amendment, which creates
a new, but undemocratic, citizenship of Europe.

We are faced with the creation of a federal state. We are being
invited and cajoled into becoming members without the meaning being
fully explained. A 'Yes' vote will force us into dual citizenship.

This far-reaching change has been played down in the presentation of
the case for a 'Yes' vote. Not only has the Referendum Commission
failed on this; all the 'Yes' campaign political parties have as
well.

A victory for the 'No' vote would produce a pause and lead to a period
of consultation. After the rejection of Nice by the Dutch and French
there was a pause for reflection. A similar consequence of a 'No' vote
now would be more dramatic, more far-reaching.

Ireland is uniquely placed to bring out the true facts that have been
suppressed. By voting 'No' we will emphasise the huge issue involved
in the constitutional change.

The truth lies ahead of us. It will be not be nice if we vote 'Yes'.
But it will be open to being put right if we vote 'No'.

Source: http://www.independent.ie/opinion/analysis/this-is-the-only-way-to-ensure-we-have-a-say-in-our-future-1406122.html

- o O o -

No One's Had More From The EU Than The Irish. So Why Have So Many Of
Them Turned Against Brussels?

By Ruth Dudley Edwards
Daily Mail, UK,
12th June 2008

For decades, Ireland has benefited from the largesse of European
taxpayers.

Even Eurosceptics admit that the EU has been crucial in Ireland's
transformation from a relatively small country dependent
overwhelmingly on trade with its former ruler Britain into a wealthy
modern state that can compete on the world stage.

Why then might this country, which is popularly regarded as the
economic miracle of the EU, vote against the Lisbon Treaty today -
even though all the major political parties want it to vote Yes?

Essentially, the Irish are veering towards No for two reasons: they
don't trust their own politicians, and they feel Brussels has got too
big for its boots.

They changed their prime minister recently and haven't really taken to
the new man, Brian Cowen, the former finance minister who succeeded
the well-liked if rather dodgy charmer Bertie Ahern.

Cowen and the uncharismatic leaders of the other major political
parties are poor salesmen whose absence of substantial arguments have
exposed the vacuity of the pro-Treaty case.

There are No voters who don't care one way or the other about the EU
but who just want to give the government a bloody nose. But there are
many more who were once Euro-enthusiasts but are increasingly worried
that unelected bureaucrats are stealthily grabbing power that should
remain with nation states.

It is an appalling reflection on the EU that Ireland is the only
country putting the Treaty to the electorate and that it is doing so
only because this is a constitutional requirement.

The fact is that, of the half-a-billion or so European citizens who
will be affected if the Treaty goes through, only one in 100 - the
Irish - have the right to vote on it.

Many Irish citizens realise this is an awesome responsibility and a
referendum that really matters.

They know perfectly well that their political leaders are furious that
they could not avoid the constitutional requirement to have a vote
because they are terrified of losing it.

They know, too, that the eyes of the European political establishment
are on them.

Bernard Kouchner, the French foreign minister, is the latest outsider
to attempt to bully the electorate.

A No vote would be greeted with 'gigantic incomprehension', he said.

'The first victims would be the Irish.'

Such interventions have served only to boost the No campaign.

Another factor that has helped the No cause is the deeply unimpressive
admission of the Irish PM that he hasn't even read the Treaty.

It is true that most of those who have tried to read the 287-page
document have given up because it is so impenetrable. But an ever-
growing section of opinion is now saying firmly that only mugs sign up
to anything they don't understand.

In fact, some polls suggest that the single biggest reason for voting
No is that people do not know what effect the Treaty might have on
them.

The lamp-posts of Dublin are festooned with posters. Those from the
Yes side feature photographs of prominent politicians with bland
messages like 'Good for Ireland and Good for Europe'. 'Trust us' is
the theme.

The message is: 'Don't worry your pretty little heads about the
issues. This is just a tidying-up operation.'

But many voters believe they are being bamboozled.

It is striking that the No campaign is bewilderingly varied so often
contradictory - with various factions, for example, attacking the
Treaty simultaneously for being socialist and capitalist, or both too
pro and too anti union rights.

This is proof positive that no one really understands what the Treaty
entails.

Sinn Fein, the political wing of the IRA, denounces it as militaristic
and the pro-lifers think it's a gateway to abortion, which at present
is outlawed in Ireland unless the mother's life is in danger.

And although the Irish are well aware that a nation with a history of
large-scale emigration should be hospitable, voters see the Treaty as
opening the floodgates to migrants.

Over the past four or five years there has been a massive increase in
foreign job-seekers and, as the credit crunch hits, the pressure on
public services caused by Poles, Lithuanians and all manner of other
European citizens is causing tension.

Then there's the perception that Brussels is corrupt and corrupting.
Irish voters who follow British politics are watching with interest
the sleaze allegations about greedy MEPs which are presently
embarrassing the Tories and will shortly be troubling Labour and the
Lib Dems.

Traditionally, financial chicanery was tolerated in Ireland, but
revelations about Bertie Ahern's mystifying acquisition of thousands
of pounds when he was in government are damaging all politicians
despite Mr Ahern's denials of any wrongdoing.

Many informed observers would nowadays assume that when it comes to
the EU gravy train, Irish MEPs will be helping themselves with extra-
large ladles.

Most important, even though the Irish have historically been
Europhiles, there is a widespread unease about any further erosion of
sovereignty.

Many voters see all too clearly the irony of their leading politicians
telling them to put their faith in the unelected bureaucrats of a
profoundly antidemocratic Brussels.

A letter to a newspaper this week pithily summed up the mystery and
murkiness that surrounds the Treaty by pointing out concerns about how
it would affect the rights to abortion.

The correspondent said that Article 13 of the Charter of Fundamental
Rights promised that 'scientific research shall be free of
constraint', suggesting that it would authorise abortion in Ireland.

That could have a profound change. While those people in Britain who
expressed worries about the the possibility of legalising animal-human
hybrids following the recent debate over the Human Fertilisation and
Embryology Bill were offered some safeguards, there appear to be none
for Irish pro-lifers.

Indeed, the prospect of scientists being allowed to do whatever the
hell they like is horrifying, and close scrutiny of any part of this
Treaty reveals ambiguities and small print that should make anyone
wary.

Reassurances that new powers will be used sparingly and responsibly
are worthless.

EU legislation is now such a complex area that there is probably no
one who fully understands it. As in Britain, where increasingly courts
over-rule Parliament, Ireland is realising that it could, in future,
be at the mercy of foreign judges.

The voters in Ireland may not understand the Treaty, but they
understand the erosion of sovereignty. That is why Brian Cowen and his
opposite numbers in the big parties have been reduced to begging the
voters to say Yes.

The feeling in the streets is that they are more likely to say No.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1025868/COMMENT-No-ones-EU-Irish-So-turned-Brussels.html

- o O o -

European Treaty: Irish Plan To Get Around 'No' Vote

By Bruno Waterfield in Brussels
Daily Telegraph, UK,
11 June, 2008.

Officials in Brussels are working on plans to ensure that the European
Treaty is still implemented elsewhere if Ireland votes against it in
the referendum.

Although measures such as creating an EU president, "foreign minister"
and European diplomatic service may be delayed, they are still
expected to be introduced.

One diplomat said a "bridging mechanism" was being discussed. If
Ireland rejects the treaty, it may simply be removed from the list of
signatories and will not be legally obliged to abide by it.

By late 2009 or early 2010, when Croatia joins the EU, an amending
"Accession Treaty" will be signed by all members including Dublin.

Incorporated into it would be a series of protocol texts giving paper
"opt-outs" on controversial Irish EU issues, such as taxation powers
or greater military co-operation.

Such texts would be similar to Britain's existing protocol opt-outs on
the Charter of Fundamental Rights and social issues in the Lisbon
Treaty text being ratified in Westminster.

Ireland, like the rest of the Europe, does not hold referendums on EU
enlargement treaties and with new protocol opt-outs Dublin may get a
new Accession Treaty past the Irish parliament without a popular
vote.

"This mechanism would be no more incomprehensible or legalistic than
the Treaty itself," said one official.

"It is probably no more difficult than the legal footwork necessary to
turn the Constitutional Treaty into [the] Lisbon [Treaty] after the
French and Dutch rejected it. The issue will be timing."

In recent weeks, Irish officials have held secret talks to implement
the Lisbon Treaty regardless of any referendum on the text.

During talks to create an EU diplomatic corps on May 7 and May 13,
Irish diplomats presented a position on the composition of the
European External Action Service and role of the EU's new "foreign
minister".

Secret minutes seen by The Daily Telegraph show that Ireland's EU
ambassador, Bobby McDonagh, pleaded with his colleagues to keep the
talks and Dublin's position confidential. "[We] have to remain
cautious in presenting these issues [referendum]!," the minutes
record.

The House of Lords rejected a Conservative bid to force a British
referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, with Liberal Democrat peers siding
with the Government to defeat the move by 280 votes to 218.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/2113401/European-Treaty-Irish-plan-to-get-around-%27no%27-vote.html

(These news stories are posted under ‘Fair Use’ provisions)

See also:

The Elite’s Secretive Plan For A ‘North American Union’
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NAU1.HTM
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NAU2.HTM
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NAU3.HTM

‘The Plan For Three World Wars’
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/3WARS.HTM

Ready and Waiting: 'The Constitution for the Newstates of America'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NEWSTATE.HTM

'Astounding Quotes From The Political And Financial Elite On The
Planned New World Order' http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/TRAGEDY.HTM

Archived ‘New World Order Intelligence Update’ Articles on the ‘New
World Order’
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/sect22.htm

- o O o -

See the recently-added stunning photos of a chemtrail tanker creating
a 'Chemtrail X' in the skies over Toronto, Canada, together with more
amazing photos of chemtrails over Toronto – plus, WE get chemtrailed
as a result!

See also the astonishing ‘earthquake cloud’ photographs which
appear to indicate Tesla-type ionization of the atmosphere directly
before the recent massive Gansu And Sichuan earthquakes in China.
Was this a HAARP hit?

All this, and more, at 'Chemtrails: Are They For Climate Control,
Weather Modification, 'Black Ops' Or For Biological Warfare
And Mass Vaccine Testing?'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/BLACK-OP.HTM

And see also...

'Nikolai Tesla And Soviet Scalar Electromagnetic Weapons'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/SCALAR.HTM

- o O o-

Did Tsar Nicholas II Of Russia And The Romanov Royal Family Die In The
Ipatiev House in Ekaterinburg - Or Did Britain And The U.S. Cooperate
In Their Secret Rescue...?

History says 'NO', but some surprising voices say 'YES!'

Read online or download for free the 1920's book, 'Rescuing The Czar:
Two Authentic Diaries', together with some equally surprising news
reports, at http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/histrus3.htm

You'll find a wide range of other free online classic history and
travel books (on English history, American History, Canadian History,
European History, Napoleonic History, Russian History, German History,
Greek and Roman History), plus the books of Jane Austen, at
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/freehist.htm

Check frequently for new free online Classic Travel Book titles at
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/freetrav.htm

And for free online Classic Christian Books and Writings…
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/SERMONS.HTM

- o O o -

Mimico-by-the-Lake.Com…

highly recommends 'Alfs Antiques And Handcrafted Furniture' in
Toronto for the finest in antique furniture, Canadian antique
reproduction
furniture, Quebec-style antique furniture reproductions, and for
classic handcrafted 'farmhouse' and boardroom tables made from
beautiful salvaged one hundred-year old wood. Individual and timeless
artisan-crafted furniture classics which become treasured family
heirlooms! Visit Alfs Antiques And Handcrafted Furniture at
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/alfs2.htm

Looking for superior Maid Service, Condo Cleaning or House Cleaning
in
the Toronto, Etobicoke, Mimico, Mimico-by-the-Lake, Mississauga,
Scarborough, North York, Richmond Hill, or North York areas? We
highly
recommend Prestige Plus Maid Service,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/prestige.htm

Other Toronto, Etobicoke and Mimico-by-the-Lake businesses we
recommend:

Chasers Juice, for fresh fruit and vegetable juices,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/juices.htm
Café du Lac (‘A Taste of Quebec), Mimico-by-the-Lake,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/cafes.htm
Birds & Beans Coffee Shop (Quality shade-grown fair trade coffee)
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/coffee.htm
Mimico Pharmacy & Postal Outlet, Mimico-by-the-Lake,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/pharmacy.htm
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/postal.htm
Great Canadian Oil Change, Mimico-by-the-Lake,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/car-lube.htm
Vatra Cheese Deli, Mimico-by-the-Lake,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/deli.htm
Fahrenheit Tanning Salon, Mimico-by-the-Lake,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/tanning.htm
Lakeshore Valu-Mart, Mario & Selina’s No Frills, Sobey’s Supermarket &
Pharmacy No Frills
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/super.htm

Thinking of taking a nature ecotour, surfing, snorkeling, or scuba-
diving vacation in Costa Rica?
You’ll find the itinerary given on our Costa Rica Eco-Tours page
really interesting (Please note: this is a past, example page – some
details may vary now)
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/ecotours.htm

Want to rent a beautiful beachfront vacation home in Santa Teresa, in
the Mal Pais area of Puntarenas province, on the west coast of Costa
Rica? ‘Beachsong’ is a 2.5 acre wooded and private property right on
the beach – perfect for surfing, snorkeling, scuba-diving, or just for
fishing, swimming and relaxing! A new property, with multiple modern
amenities, it’s thoroughly air-conditioned, has two bedrooms and is
available for 1-4 renters. You can find out more at
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/mal-pais.htm