|
| JBuilder vs JDevelopper Fra : cdeoliveira@dijon.at~ |
Dato : 13-12-00 14:57 |
|
I've a development to do in Java language to do stock control, on local
machine.
I think JBuilder with JDatastore is better to do what i want (NO database
administration) but other members of my group prefer working with Oracle
Lite and JDeveloper.
What do you think?
| |
N/A (14-12-2000)
| Kommentar Fra : N/A |
Dato : 14-12-00 08:16 |
|
| |
Dennis Thrysøe (14-12-2000)
| Kommentar Fra : Dennis Thrysøe |
Dato : 14-12-00 08:16 |
|
As far as I know, JDeveloper are slightly modified versions of Borlands
previous JBuilder versions (JDeveloper 3 would be based on JBuilder 2...).
-dennis
crg wrote:
> JBuilder 4 or JBuilder 3?
> JBuilder 4 is an improvement on 3 and has some nice features. I am currently
> trying it instead of JDeveloper but I'm not yet convinced it is better than
> JDeveloper. If you use JBuilder 4 make sure youve got at least 128MB RAM, if
> not more ... and a fast processor.
> JBuilder 3 .... forget it IMHO
>
> For the database access stuff I use the Oracle JDBC libraries direct to
> Oracle 8.1.6 so I've no idea what would be better for your app.
>
> C
>
> <cdeoliveira@dijon.atiss.fr> wrote in message
> news:917v9p$d3l$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net...
>
>> I've a development to do in Java language to do stock control, on local
>> machine.
>> I think JBuilder with JDatastore is better to do what i want (NO database
>> administration) but other members of my group prefer working with Oracle
>> Lite and JDeveloper.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
| |
Mark Stephens (14-12-2000)
| Kommentar Fra : Mark Stephens |
Dato : 14-12-00 20:13 |
|
I defected to VisualCafe and have returned to JBuilder 4, which is very
nice. Don't other with JBuilder 3. If you access the DB through JDBC, you
should be able to make the product more scaleable/easy to deveop.
Regards,
MArk
crg <craig.gould@*REMOVE.THIS*bt.com> wrote in message
news:918322$lgb$1@pheidippides.axion.bt.co.uk...
> JBuilder 4 or JBuilder 3?
> JBuilder 4 is an improvement on 3 and has some nice features. I am
currently
> trying it instead of JDeveloper but I'm not yet convinced it is better
than
> JDeveloper. If you use JBuilder 4 make sure youve got at least 128MB RAM,
if
> not more ... and a fast processor.
> JBuilder 3 .... forget it IMHO
>
> For the database access stuff I use the Oracle JDBC libraries direct to
> Oracle 8.1.6 so I've no idea what would be better for your app.
>
> C
>
> <cdeoliveira@dijon.atiss.fr> wrote in message
> news:917v9p$d3l$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net...
> > I've a development to do in Java language to do stock control, on local
> > machine.
> > I think JBuilder with JDatastore is better to do what i want (NO
database
> > administration) but other members of my group prefer working with Oracle
> > Lite and JDeveloper.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> >
>
>
| |
Pedro Jesus (14-12-2000)
| Kommentar Fra : Pedro Jesus |
Dato : 14-12-00 17:06 |
|
cdeoliveira@dijon.atiss.fr wrote:
> I've a development to do in Java language to do stock control, on local
> machine.
> I think JBuilder with JDatastore is better to do what i want (NO database
> administration) but other members of my group prefer working with Oracle
> Lite and JDeveloper.
>
> What do you think?
Have you tried JBuilder 4 and pointbase ( www.pointbase.com ) ?
--
Pedro Jesus
Quadriga, SA
http://www.quadriga.pt
eMail: pedro.jesus@quadriga.pt
Phone: (+351) 21.413 56 70
| |
|
|