EN FRANÇAIS SUR FR.SOC.POLITIQUE !
MERDE !!! STRONT !!! KAKA !
ON NE VOUS LIT PAS DANS LA LANGUE IMPÉRIALE !
Koos Nolst Trenite a écrit :
> How to find out any secret of anyone, that is vital to your or others'
> well-being to be known - 'Remote Knowing' as done by any sane person
>
> 16 June 2007
> {FPP note 20070616-V1.2}
>
> (draft note)
>
> '
>
> Criminal Minds of course teach you, that "this is not possible,"
> though any manager does this twenty-four hours a day, to be able
> to do his or her job at all,
>
> to be able to care for you,
>
> but the medical "profession" and medical "scientists,"
> medical "researchers" and medical "journalists"
>
> - all being very intensely insane* -
>
> * provided you actually define the term correctly, *(n)
> which however they - the medical Criminal Minds - define
> wrongly as well, but [Definition of Insane]
>
> according to the ACTUAL Definition of Insane, they ARE highly
> insane, and according to them,
>
> it is "scientifically not possible" to know about and to
> understanding people.
>
> Really...
>
> '
>
> A health insurance company - one of the best - writes to its
> customers, that
>
> doing sports in the morning, "grows new brain cells so as
> not to be depressed."
>
> Really... Very well-meaning, but utterly insane in its
> "explanations."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> So "it is not possible", according to what THEY claim to be "science"
>
> - actually it is their 'religion' or their CULT of "science,"
> that claims, since Lavoisier and Benjamin Franklin, that
> Life Energy "does not exist" (you might as well say "Life
> does not exist") - *(n)(n)
>
> because there hardly is a more insane and more un-scientific
> statement, than
>
> 'Life Energy "does not exist",'
>
> on the order of "no water exists on Earth."
>
> It follows, then, statistically seen,
> that the most un-scientific or the most
> 'anti-scientific' person
>
> - from a purely statistical viewpoint,
> of course -
>
> would be a medical journalist or medical press
> writer,
>
> in particular one employed by the Amoral
> Press or the Associated Parrots (both
> abbreviated 'AP') *(n)
>
> topping the list of "scientific" Insanity (if
> Insanity is defined correctly). *(n)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> 'Remote Knowing' is done,
>
> as you do it all the time, every day, day and night,
>
> - and the more responsible and intelligent you are,
> the more you do it, of course -
>
> by connecting to (and doing so with your Life Energy, of course, so
> that you start to look at and become aware of) all possible answers,
> scenarios, locations, times, memories, people involved or hidden,
> etc.,
>
> regarding something or someone you want to understand, and then you
> are of course culling these to (sifting, choosing from all these) the
> actual, applicable answer and understanding.
>
> '
>
> In Buddhism they do THE REVERSE of finding actual answers,
>
> and they do so in order to END all responsibility and to END
> all understanding, and to replace it with NO LIFE and with
> their NO TRUTH which they thus have to call "Noble 'Truths',"
> (abbreviated 'No Truth') and which they also call 'Dharma' (or
> 'Dhamma').
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Connecting to all possible answers, scenarios, locations, times, etc.,
> and culling these to obtain the actual answer(s)
>
> in case you want to find out about and understand very difficult
> people and situations to penetrate,
>
> you then do
>
> preferably with the assistance of a Life Energy Fluctuation
> meter (see Introduction to Fine Particle Physics - Part ..)
>
> - which you could carry around your wrist,
>
> as you would have one anyway all the time at your wrist,
> to assist your looking at what is going on in daily
> life as you normally do look -
>
> and also, if possible, preferred for very difficult tasks worth
> spending that much time and effort on, you (then) do so with the
> help of an administrator, a secretary or assistant,
>
> who keeps you on track in looking exhaustively for all
> possible answers and scenarios and persons involved, and
> who (the assistant or secretary then) records the possible
> answers and the fluctuations these produce on the device
> at the moment the answer is considered by you.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> As Criminal Minds however, have everything in reverse,
> being Criminal Minds,
>
> these will of course NOT obtain correct answers, and if
> they DO get SOME answers, then they will hide or pervert
> the correct answers, or omit necessary parts of the
> correct answers, or they will wrongly assign who causes
> what, etc..
>
> They do so intentionally and compulsively, and they do so
> in order to manipulate and mis-direct you or others.
>
> Criminal Minds do give data, but never reliable
> data.
>
> Especially in those cases, you have constantly to verify,
> with physical (photon and sound) observation and from
> testimony and observations by other people, what is true
> and what is not,
>
> and Criminal Minds especially they lie about the
> intentions of themselves and of others:
>
> Even though "the data is verifiably true," they
> still manage to reverse truth by lying about the
> intentions that went with it.
>
> '
>
> The same applies, when you or another sane person
> looks at Criminal Minds, or does 'Remote Knowing'
> about a Criminal Mind,
>
> both in daily life looking, as well as in
> intensive 'Remote Knowing' looking,
>
> at a Criminal Mind:
>
> The Criminal Mind has layers of lies, and 'friendly'
> or also repulsive masks, and has intentionally
>
> false, fabricated "evidence" or "memories," and
> projects false feelings - which are all Energies -
> and uses these as hypnotism against you,
>
> to mis-direct and to hide that what actually
> happened and what was done by whom with what
> intention (in other words, the truth).
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> As always, the definition of Sanity applies (defined as the ability,
> desire and action also, of detecting and looking through deceptions).
> *(n)
>
> The saner a person is, the faster and the more accurately he or she
> will find also well-hidden answers, with 'Remote Knowing.'
>
> This is done in daily life exactly the same, by intelligent
> people, where feeling-connecting is providing the highest
> intelligence,
>
> simply by looking at something or someone, while scanning,
> feeling, connecting to, all possibilities and past data
> available,
>
> and this is done in a fraction of a second, normally, by
> you or by any intelligent person, in daily life.
>
> '
>
> Again, a Criminal Mind has everything in reverse, so when THEY
> do that, then THEY 'feel' the opposite:
>
> When you are a nice and caring person,
>
> then the Criminal Mind concludes, that "you are a
> dangerous, threatening person who must be destroyed
> in any possible way of deception and by means of
> Energetic attacks." *(n)[Immersed Feeling]
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Now if you HAVE found out some secrets of some people, then you will
> find out, that you also have to raise your level of ethics to a
> workable, somewhat civilized level, as I described it for instance
> in 'Rights of Criminal Minds,' and in the definition of 'respect.'
>
> So you do not go for a kind of Hammurabi "Justice" or
> Islamic type "Ethics," which are simply barbarisms
>
> and void of any ethics, based as it is on
> NO UNDERSTANDING OF LIFE AND Of PEOPLE, AT ALL.
>
> '
>
> You find the maximum of insanity, though - in the
> area of ethics and morals - extreme destructiveness,
> in the Hindu, Buddhist and New Age lies "about
> life:"
>
> Their "solution" is, to simply deny and
> ignore what is found out about people,
> because 'Karma,' or what they call "The
> Universe," "will take care of all."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> So you do not choose such "spiritual" people as your secretary
> or helpful administrator or as your listening partner,
>
> BECAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT TRUTH, they REVERSE TRUTH and
> transform it into its opposite, which they call Dharma
> or Dhamma (according to which dialect they prefer).
>
> Let's say, you find out that 'your ex-wife was a
> stealing, malicious whore in her preceding life time,'
>
> and that is the reason, that she hated the loving
> and beautiful 'sacks' you wanted to give her,
>
> and it explains, why she only can be aroused by
> ugly, treacherous 'sacks,' which you were neither
> willing to give nor capable of giving.
>
> '
>
> Now, you know, they, the Buddhist-Hindu-New-
> Age clan, those of "Love and Light," and of
> "unconditional Friendship with all," THEY
> don't care at all whether that is true or not,
> or what is now ethical or not,
>
> THEIR goal is to DESTROY any morals and ethics
> and truth, and replace it with PRETENDED
> "morals" and "truth," because
>
> according to their Dharma, according to
> THEIR "truth," "Beauty should feel like
> Ugliness and Ugliness should feel like
> Beauty"
>
> - they, the Buddhists, to practice their
> Dharma, have actual exercises for
> feeling that, for feeling everything
> in reverse,
>
> and at the same time, they have
> exercises for NOT feeling, for
> "Being detached" -
>
> THEY call that 'Dharma,' or "truth"
>
> ...how "Noble" a "Truth" indeed.
>
> '
>
> You ALSO do not choose, as an assistant, someone who is a
> pacifist or "someone who has given up fighting"
>
> as if evil and Criminals stop by themselves and are not evil
> "as long as you do not 'provoke' them or stop them,"
>
> which - not stopping them - is of course exploding your crime
> rate, and leading to eternal war, as pointed out in the
> Definition of Peace. *(n)
>
> Pacifists and Cowards are NOT interested in truth:
>
> They ARE interested in intelligent lies, to make
> their destruction seem "good" and "moral." *(n)
> [Michael Moore]
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> I will give you an example, here, of a 'Remote Knowing' procedure:
>
> Make a long list of what l. ron hubbard might be or could be or would
> be hiding from you.
>
> This could be in response to the question 'What might, could or would
> l. ron hubbard hide most from you?'
>
> Ideally, at each answer, you would write of course, how much
> change and how fast a change (in your Energy) the answer
> produces,
>
> in your Life Energy that is acting on your chemical-
> physical body of flesh and bones,
>
> changes or fluctuations measured on a highly sensitive Life
> Energy Fluctuation meter
>
> (connected with tin-or-gold-covered iron plates - or
> regular soup cans if you wish - at your hand palms or
> other meridian Life Energy points, to measure your
> body's very rapid fluctuations in electrical resistance,
> due to the Life Energy fluctuations).
>
> '
>
> Then you read that list of answers again, and you cross out (omit,
> drop) those answers, that do not trigger any Life Energy Fluctuation
> at all - the result of assuming, that these would therefore not be
> the most applicable answers. (See also below.)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> The question is formulated so, that you are striving and CAN strive
> into one direction, that of the most applicable, and therefore
> assumed to be the correct answer or scenario, for one particular
> answer.
>
> You can't make the question too narrow, of course, like
> 'Did Lee Harvey Oswald murder John F. Kennedy?' There is no
> room for looking at various scenarios and possibilities, there.
>
> But 'Who wanted to have Kennedy assassinated?' or 'Who could
> have prevented the assassination?' would be quite fruitful,
> very workable questions.
>
> Or more to the point, 'What was the intention of John F. Kennedy
> towards people?'
>
>
> This helps in the process of culling: Dropping more and more of the
> list of possible answers. Each time as you cull the list of now
> remaining possible answers, again and again, most answers will
> produce less and less Life Energy FLUCTUATION, and many answers will
> eventually drop out, not produce change anymore, because they do not
> qualify as being 'the most,' as in
>
> 'What might, could or would l. ron hubbard hide MOST from you?'
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> You will have to understand, that you find answers by connecting with
> your Life Energy to those parts of life and to those individuals and
> to those parts of your very vast but mostly hidden, "wiped out"
> memory:
>
> You are by considering the question, invited to connect your
> Energy, and thus your Awareness, to those parts that have to do
> with the subject, with the question,
>
> 'What might, could or would l. ron hubbard hide MOST from you?'
>
> '
>
> You have to get used to that, that Awareness DOES WORK LIKE THAT,
>
> (you have to get used to it again) because and when you are
> taught, in school and at your parent's house, that
>
> "You can not connect with your Energy to anything and
> become aware of it," (which is a most idiotic statement
> to make)
>
> "unless you have been taught or told about, or unless you"
>
> (have had a photon and sound proximity impression of
> it) "unless you"
>
> "have seen and heard," whatever it is,
>
> that you connect to with your perceptional Life
> Energy, so that you then visually see and audibly
> hear and thus (are allowed to) know it.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> In some cultures for instance, the children are not
> supposed to be aware of what their parents do in the
> parental bedroom, that resulted in their birth,
>
> UNLESS they have had permission in the form of
> (a photon and audio proximity experience of) seeing
> and hearing what is done there by their parents.
>
> In such a culture of hiding the basic things of life, you
> would get rather strange "answers" to the question
>
> 'What did your parents enjoy most doing together?'
>
> '
>
> So you would have to re-formulate the question to 'What did
> your parents enjoy most doing together, that you were allowed
> to see?' or such, if you wanted to avoid the truth.
>
> '
>
> And back to the subject, 'What might, could or would l. ron hubbard
> hide MOST from you, that you - of course - were NOT allowed to see
> or sense?'
>
> Then any failure from a badly defined word 'hiding,' which some
> people might interpret as meaning 'hide from eyesight or from
> hearing it,' (sight and sound, and excluding ACTUAL perception to
> Awareness) - that exclusion would be avoided by formulating it as
> including 'What were you NOT allowed to see or hear or sense?'
>
> '
> You understand, that you DO need the Definition of Truth *(n)
> for this, AND you will encounter - and reject as untrue - the
> "Awareness" of people who 'create their own reality,'
>
> their 'Negative Awareness' as I have called it,
>
> their "total certainty, that, what they would like to be true,
> 'is what exists' and what they should enforce on others 'as
> true' in order 'to make it be true',"
>
> or what has been forced into their Awareness "as true" by means
> of drugs, distorting, breaking or misaligning their Life Energy
> (perception and feeling) connections to and from their body and
> their environment.
>
> '
>
> The purpose of the whole procedure of 'Remote Knowing,' is, of course,
> to get you, or someone else, in this case to actually start to look
> at l. ron hubbard, and at what he did and does to people.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> The procedure of 'Remote Knowing,' does not require any data seen or
> heard, because you start connecting with your OWN Energy to what IS
> there. *(n)[Intro FPP - p11]
>
> And basically you can apply the action to anything, that
>
> you do not know about but HAVE TO KNOW ABOUT, for your
> own or for others' well-being.
>
> Just formulate a proper question and start to look at more and
> more POSSIBLE answers to it, which gets you to connect with your
> OWN Energy more and more, to what IS there.
>
> It is helpful, of course, to have someone else asking and directing
> your attention or connecting Energy
>
> (by asking you the question, and by helping you to cull the list
> more and more and by assisting you in recording the Life Energy
> Fluctuations on the measuring device, to see which ones still
> produce a fluctuation, and which ones do not anymore and thus
> can be dropped from the list of possibe answers, as you work
> to narrow it down to probably one answer, as 'What is l. ron
> hubbard hiding MOST').
>
> And naturally you cross-check your data, and verify what you
> got, with everything you can lay your hands or eyes on,
>
> exactly as you do too in daily life, doing any available
> cross-checking,
>
> which will likely confirm and broaden the understanding gained
> from your Remote Knowing.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> You will be amazed, especially in the beginning, how much you are
> capable of connecting to things, people, situations, locations,
> and memories, that you thus can become aware of.
>
> This is your natural, normal way of perception and knowing
> in the first place.
>
> But Criminal Minds have hammered it out of you and purged it
> from "science."
>
> '
>
> And because l. ron hubbard severely DISTURBS and BLOCKS
> Awareness-connection to the most vital 'things' to know
> and to see and to understand in life - to people,
> basically -
>
> which he does by means of his Harmful Energies,
> that are also echoed and amplified by others,
> *(n)(n)
>
> it is indicated, that the first question to be asked
> (with all possible answers looked at) and then culled
>
> (dropping more and more of the possible answers,
> those that produce no Fluctuation or change anymore,
> till you are left with the most likely true answer)
>
> the first question then,
>
> is: 'What might, could or would l. ron hubbard hide MOST
> from you, that you - of course - were NOT allowed to see
> or sense?'
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Again: You will be amazed, especially in the beginning, how much you
> are capable of CONNECTING to things - people, situations, locations,
> and memories - that you thus can become aware of
>
> - and, no matter how much the medical profession and its
> "science" "for the benefit of Mankind" has destroyed
> it and keeps destroying it, in you and others - *(n)
> [medical]
>
> it is your natural ability and way of life in the first place. *(n)
>
> In fact, I am doing that each time (but then so fast, that I do
> not need nor want anything written down)
>
> also when I use a Life Energy Fluctuation meter to find out
> something that is very strongly hidden or camouflaged etc.,
> but that I need to put my attention on, when
>
> I need to find out something about others, for your well-being, as
> always.
>
> Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
> human rights philosopher and poet
>
> 'God gave Solomon wisdom
> and very great insight,
> and a breadth of understanding
> as measureless
> as the sand on the seashore.'
>
> 1 Kings 4:29
>
> _________
> Footnotes:
>
> (as indicated)
>
> __________
> References:
>
> (as applicable)
>
> ____________
> Verification:
>
>
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
>
> Copyright 2007 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
> and poet
> This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
> anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
> who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
> to others who might be able to learn from it.
> None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
> or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
> encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
> about any organizations or individuals.
> Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
> PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
>