'My Pearls not for Pigs'
6 August 2006
(Revision 2.4)
(Version 2.4
on 30 Apr 2007)
(Suitable for foreign
language students)
'
The "respondent(s)" - to whom this applies (in the proverb,
they are referred to as 'pigs') - is (are) already covered in
'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds'
{HRI 20030509-V4.2.1}
(9 May 2003 - Version 4.2.1 on 30 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/1de918df6abdd38c
and further, in
'Criminal Minds ENJOY LYING And THEY Know They Intentionally Lie'
{HRI 20050527-V3.5.2}
(27 May 2005 - Version 3.5.2 on 16 Jul 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/c8b4f54782dc87e8
and they are understood most thoroughly, in
'Dismantling Criminal Minds - Fine Particle Physics
Major Discoveries' ('How to become free of evil people')
{FPP 20070331-V2.6} {HRI 20070331-V2.6}
(31 March 2007 - V2.6 on 27 Apr 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/3d4fa229d342e4d8
'
'
Anybody, who DENIES the existence and relevance of
Criminal Minds (of Sociopaths), is most likely one
himself (or herself)
regardless of what religious, or political or
scientific orientation he (or she) may pretend
to adhere to, or on the other hand, may be lacking
in:
Criminal Minds can be and are found in ANY
religion, any nationality, any race, any age,
any gender, any profession, and at any level
of education or wealth, or the lack of these.
At least one percent of the living population on
Earth consists of very severely Criminal Minds.
Examples: Kim Long Ill, Kim Ill Sung,
Hu Jintao, Jiang Zemin, Mao Zedong,
Vladimir Putin, Patrushev,
Ahmadinejad, Kahmenei, Kohmeini,
Haniyeh, Yasser Arafat,
Castro and Chavez, Gaddafi,
Lukoschenko,
are Criminal Minds
- regardless of whether you like to see that.
(Stalin, Ghengis Khan, Pol Pot and
Hitler, for instance, are generally
known as Criminal Minds.)
'
'
'
The "respondent(s)" tries(try) to have the matter I write about,
not read, not understood, or not discussed,
in some cases, they pretend the very opposite by
the method of claiming (by giving "advice"), that
what I write, "is not in a readable format or
layout," and also "is too long," and, that
(therefore) "nobody will read it,"
a PRETENSE and a claim, that in fact - as it
turned out to be, in each case - IS a standard
response of Criminal Minds;
THEY feel irritated exactly BY the
CLARITY of the layout or format,
much in the same way as some feel
"irritated" by the clarity of
Bach's music,
because it OPPOSES confusion,
and of course, THEY feel irritated by
ANY length of what I write and say, yes,
even by my presence and by my looking at
them,
much in the same way as some
contemporaries of Mozart wanted
to have him away or get rid of
him:
His Beauty EXPOSES their
Ugliness, makes it visible,
much like honesty does
inevitably reveal treachery;
'
further, the attentive reader will have
noticed, that the layout precisely is
intended and thus allows the reader
to spend as little or as much time as he or
she desires to spend on reading,
by seeing and understanding, that the indented
text gives more and more EXPANSION or detail
of the subject;
all of which the "respondent(s)" does
(do) not mention,
'
and basically, the "respondent(s)" mentioned or implied, are
describing themselves only, or are outing themselves as being
Criminal Minds (as Sociopaths)
- if they were not already known as such.
'
In this case, he (or she, as the case may be) wants, that
the nature of the subject, and anyone addressed - but in
particular he (or she) himself -
is NOT (or not at all correctly) UNDERSTOOD BY OTHERS, IS
NOT (or not at all properly) FELT BY OTHERS,
they try to prevent the subject from being looked at and
discussed by people who WOULD be interested in having a correct
feeling for the subject, as it is
read and felt and understood by those for whom indeed
Koos Nolst Trenite, or "Cause Trinity" as they call him in English
language areas, who is arguably the most intelligent, beautiful,
caring and loving, and most truthful philosopher known, wrote:
On May 1, 7:16 am, Koos Nolst Trenite
<AmbassadorForMank...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The "Islamic" Head Scarf ('Chador') IS an act of Suppression AND of
> WANTING TO BE SUPPRESSED
>
> 30 April 2007
>
> {HRI 20070312-A}
>
> (Addition to
> {HRI 20070312-V2.3})
>
> '
>
> The "Islamic" Head Scarf ('Chador') IS an act of suppression AND of
> WANTING TO BE Suppressed:
>
> ONLY Criminally minded individuals do want to suppress others, "for
> their own good, of course," and
>
> ONLY Criminally minded individuals do want to BE SUPPRESSED, "in
> order to be good" so that they are able to claim and to pretend
> in the group, that "they are good,"
>
> when they wear a scarf, then the community "must regard
> them as good,"
>
> because THEY AGREE TO BE DOMINATED AND SUPPRESSED,
>
> whereas a woman who does not, "must be imprisoned or even
> killed,"
>
> because THEY AGREE TO BE DOMINATED AND SUPPRESSED,
>
> and the same applies to men who enforce the scarf
> or chador on women, such men "are good,"
>
> BECAUSE they AGREE TO DOMINATE AND SUPPRESS.
>
> '
>
> This is why ALSO some women insist on the use of a head scarf
> or 'chador,'
>
> pretending it to be "religious," they camouflage their
> demand that "people must be suppressed," they hide it
> behind religion: *(5)(11)
>
> ONLY Criminally minded individuals do want to BE SUPPRESSED,
> "in order to be good," meaning, in order to be able
>
> to claim and to pretend, that "they are good," "because
> they follow the rules - even 'holy' rules."
>
> So religion in actual fact only exists for them,
> like for many (deceased or living) dictators too,
>
> to "prove, that they - observing the rituals - are
> therefore 'good'" even though they are having a
> very criminal mind set.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> While it, at first glance, seems to be in particular a domination
> based on gender (on being a man or woman), that is merely a method
> that is used:
>
> '
>
> IT IN FACT IS A DEMAND AND ENFORCEMENT of
>
> AGREEING TO BE SUPPRESSED AND
> DEMANDING OTHERS TO BE SUPPRESSED AND
> DEMANDING OF OTHERS TO SUPPRESS
>
> - and thus it targets ALL PEOPLE, brings ALL PEOPLE into
> submission,
>
> to "provide security" - as a Criminal Mind "defines"
> "security."
>
> '
>
> That is, however, the mind-set of criminals only - because any
> sane person knows, that both men and women have exactly NOT to
> be suppressed in order to develop their nature,
>
> which IS to love people, to love life and to create
> beauty in life and to provide joy for each other.
>
> Anything opposed to that, IS the nature of the Criminal
> Mind, and of people who have taken to the Criminal mind-
> set. *(a)(11)
>
> In the mind of the Criminal, "ALL people are basically
> Criminal - and therefore ALL people HAVE TO BE SUPPRESSED
> AND HAVE TO AGREE TO BE SUPPRESSED AND DOMINATED."
>
> That is of course only true in a Criminal society,
> and such an enforcement MAKES the Criminal elements
> of the society be in charge, and all decent and
> caring people be vilified, arrested, mutilated,
> or even tortured to death.
>
> '
>
> Therefore, the "Islamic" Head Scarf ('Chador,' etc.) has no place
> in ANY civilized society or country or community,
>
> and its use should be discouraged and if possible forbidden with
> the above-mentioned, correct reasoning, if it has not already
> been forbidden, in all public life.
>
> The same applies to any 'Sharia' law practice or other primitive
> tribal customs linked or not linked to some religion.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> The purpose of religion is NOT to destroy life - BUT it IS in the
> minds of criminal individuals - to "secure life" by stifling and
> destroying the most beautiful and the most loving parts of life
> itself. *(5)(11)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Indeed exactly the same applies to "Islamic" or Sharia "Law," which,
> again, is an instrument that ONLY Criminally minded individuals do
> want to use in order to suppress others, "for their own good, of
> course,"
>
> and ONLY Criminally minded individuals do want to BE SUPPRESSED, "in
> order to be good," or in order to be able to claim and pretend, that
> "they are good," "because they follow the (even 'holy') rules."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> This Human Rights Issue acts on HRI 'Religious Freedom'
> {HRI 20030407-3-V1.0.1} *(5) and
>
> adds to the sense of {HRI 20070312-V2.3} which is included
> below:
>
> '
>
> 'Islamic Men Forced To Wear Veil, In Order Not To Arouse Women'
>
> 12 March 2007
> {HRI 20070312-V2.3}
>
> (Version 2.3
> on 16 March 2007)
>
> (based on Quote from
> {HRI 20060521-V1.4.1-UAA})
>
> (view Summary
> by skipping
> indentation)
>
> '
>
> "Suppression of men is necessary, in order to protect the morality of
> women" - obviously - by applying, "what does apply to Islamic women,"
> also to Islamic men:
>
> In some Islamic cultures, the girls and women are told to cover
> their hair, even their whole body, "because they have to stop
> (or to 'not invite') 'the bestial desires of men;' they have to
> dominate the 'Sacks'ual behavior of men towards women." (*)
>
> Some people might give you other "reasons" - which are,
> however, merely to hide that actual intention:
>
> A destructive intention, which is actually
>
> - and you will understand at some time, THAT
> it is actually, and that it is ONLY -
>
> 'to please Criminal Minds:' Assuming, and then also
> putting into practice, THEIR very false views about
> people. *(7)
>
> '
>
> Now, it is so, that I happen to be a man, and - like the vast
> majority of men - I do not at all have any 'bestial desires that
> should be curbed' by anyone, also not by women.
>
> But it is Criminal Minds, who do want you to think, that
> "all people have bestial desires"
>
> - which is not true at all, except for THEMSELVES:
>
> Criminal Minds always talk about THEMSELVES, when they
> talk "about people."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Truly Criminal Minds do form only ONE PERCENT of the
> living population on Earth,
>
> in equal amounts both as women and as men, and of
> any age, any religion, any caste or social position
> or profession or race, any nationality,
>
> '
>
> and - should you have been indoctrinated
> and were "totally convinced" of opposing
> concepts, nevertheless - the facts
> (which you easily can collect) are
>
> facts that are COMPLETELY REFUTING, that are
> disproving, that are going in the teeth of any
> concept of "natural or divine justice," or
> "Karma" and the like,
>
> concepts that have been introduced
> intentionally and enforced, simply by
> Criminal Minds,
>
> purposely and very effectively
> intending to make it impossible
> for you to recognize (them) or to
> expect to see (them) there were
> you are NOT supposed to see them
> at all:
>
> Criminal Minds at very high places
> of authority, of highest ability,
> of superior education, knowledge
> or wealth, their true nature and
> intentions masked with stolen
> beauty, with charisma,
>
> '
>
> as the history books profusely tell you, that such
> positions ARE used by Criminal Minds, to hide in,
>
> again, completely refuting and disproving
> anything like "natural or divine justice," or
> "Karma" and the like, any such "Divine or
> Cosmic laws," that are thus
>
> - by actual proof, and to your and my
> intense regret - but nevertheless
> those pretended "laws of life" are
>
> INTENTIONALLY FALSE concepts or expectations,
> that you are asked to believe in and thus to
> work with and "to expect of life." *(8)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> And to the very intelligent and faithful
> reader it is obvious, already from those
> facts
>
> - combined with the knowledge
>
> you may have restored to yourself
> by now, if that knowledge was
> taken from you,
>
> that everyone is (and that I am and
> that you are) an immortal soul -
>
> putting the available facts together,
> makes it obvious,
>
> that a Criminal Mind does not become less of
> a Criminal Mind by 'doing good deeds,' nor
> does he or she become a worse Criminal Mind,
> by 'doing bad deeds,' *(8)
>
> the condition of their soul does
> remain as it is,
>
> but his or her Criminal Impulses CAN be
> blocked by others, and be prevented from
> being executed,
>
> as it is done all the time for you
> in order that you and others have
> some degree of safety, and
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> I thought it is about time, that you get used
> to having some understanding of Criminal
> Minds,
>
> rather than eternally complaining about
> what these do, and about the deceptions
> these carry out
>
> and about the atrocities that these will
> FOREVER TRY TO INFLICT on you and me and
> others whom you love very greatly,
>
> it is about time, that you get
> used to having some understanding
> of Criminal Minds,
>
> '
>
> RATHER than your accepting their eternal - and
> no doubt 'exceedingly "Divine," "Holy" and
> "Cosmic"' - lies about themselves and about
> you, their (Hindu, Buddhist, and New Age) lies
> "about life," their stupidifying "recipes for
> peace" and their blind "insights" "about life
> on Earth,"
>
> lies, that are, so they claim,
> "applicable to ALL PEOPLE," but
>
> without ever looking or wanting to
> really look at people, at the souls,
> and at the actual past, at the actual
> intentions of people,
>
> and instead, these "wisest of all"
> rather do promote their own "comfortable
> view of themselves" and of others,
>
> their very, very atrocious lies about you,
> about the actually decent, and about the
> actually caring, and about the actually
> courageous,
>
> and INSTEAD of looking at you, they
> promote their
>
> lies about 'the people,' as a generality or
> as a supposed average of what they call "the
> people of Earth," of
>
> '
>
> "people being that evil, that they have
> to dwell on Earth, till 'miraculously',"
>
> by some form of entirely non-
> existing 'spiritual Darwinism,'
>
> "they (people) are 'cured,' and according
> to some (who are the 'wisest of all'),
> that cure occurs only - and at that,
> even automatically - after 6000 life
> times have passed," *(8)
>
> refusing to look at people, they
> accuse "all people," that is, what
> THEY call
>
> "the people" - who are not at all 'the people
> of Earth,' because people are not uniform or
> equal at all, on Earth, but - 'the people' are
> consisting of two
>
> completely opposed, and irreconcilably,
> irreparably opposed
>
> '
>
> categories (which, OF COURSE, the Criminal
> Minds want you NOT to see, and they want you
> to vehemently deny the extreme difference):
>
> The one category, Criminal Minds, are FIGHTING
> people, always, and in any way they can,
>
> in order either to dominate, or to exterminate
> everyone, or to in that sequence do both -
>
> FOR WHICH THEY FIRST HAVE TO GET IN
> CHARGE of people, in whatever way works,
>
> like they, Criminal Minds, in old France
> wanted you to believe their pretense of
> "LIBERTY, FRATERNITY AND EQUALITY,"
>
> nice idea, a condition that is naturally
> occurring ANYWAY IF THERE WERE NO
> Criminal Minds,
>
> but that is not the case, on Earth, at
> all, as anyone knows who lost his head
> on the guillotine "and thus kept it cool
> enough" to experience, that 'LIBERTY,
> FRATERNITY AND EQUALITY,' is a pretense,
> a TRICK,
>
> and right now (unless you are a
> Criminal Mind, or unless you are
> a spiritual slave to one or more
> Criminal Minds, yourself, then
> you probably will not want to,
> but)
>
> you can name a whole string of
> Criminal Minds WHO ARE HEADS OF
> STATE,
>
> the most dangerous
> ones being Putin and
> Hu Jintao, currently,
>
> being dangerous especially then,
> and in those societies, where they
> are NOT restrained by the press
> and by judges and by public
> prosecutors and
>
> also not by the many free,
> responsible individuals and
> their various institutions
> in the society,
>
> when they are NOT stopped by the
> general population, and by the
> people of other governments, too,
> then
>
> these heads of state will try to
> PREVENT freedom and to PREVENT
> justice and to PREVENT peace,
>
> and indeed they do support and do
> try to get and keep in place also
> other severely Criminal heads of
> other states,
>
> as the diligent reader is well aware,
>
> of what these Criminal Minds want with
> their "equality," and with their "giving
> back the power to 'the people',"
>
> like in "socialism" or "communism"
> or in other forms of worshiping
> the most severely Criminal Minds,
> and of "putting the nation in the
> care of Criminals,"
>
> like anywhere, where Criminal
> Minds,
>
> for instance 'Che' Guevara
> or Mao Zedong, or Korea's
> Kim very Ill Sung or his son
> Kim very Long Ill, or where
> Russia's Stalin, etc.,
>
> are celebrated and worshiped as
> "fighters for the well-being of
> people," or as "returning the
> power to the people,"
>
> in order to justify a dictatorial
> society, that the Criminal Minds PRETEND
> is "(of or for) the people,"
>
> by which the Criminal Minds do not
> at all mean what they SAY it is,
> "of and for the people," but THEY
> mean to have "government"
>
> like a mafia does try to
> have the society as much
> as possible dominated
>
> by THEIR "people," by the Criminal
> Minds
>
> - because Criminal Minds FOR THEM
> ARE "the people" -
>
> who are violently opposed to
> all normal people, and who
> are only
>
> making up about one percent of the
> whole population, one percent
>
> who wish to "govern" - meaning, to
> DOMINATE or even exterminate -
> ninety-nine percent of the (very
> stupid) population, you and me,
> that is, included,
>
> Putin wants to DOMINATE
> people, which he, being
> a Criminal Mind, firmly
> believes IS "government,"
> while ENJOYING to be evil,
> and
>
> Chavez wants to DOMINATE
> people, destroy all their
> sense of responsibility,
> and reverse their sense
> of good and evil and of
> caring for people and of
> owning things, and
>
> the "Islamic" Osama bin
> Laden is an extreme case,
> he wants to DOMINATE people
> into EXTERMINATING their
> own life and that of as
> many others as possible,
>
> like a modern-day
> Heinrich Himmler,
> needing, of course,
> other Criminal Minds
> and spiritually
> enslaved people, to
> carry it out,
>
> a 'devil incarnate'
> that the Islamic
> people SHOULD be
> stoning, rather than
> 'throwing stones at
> a pillar in Mecca'
> or even at people
> "accused" of feeling
> and also expressing
> their strong love in
> a very natural way,
> 'sacks'ually that is,
> for each other,
>
> and OF COURSE they, Criminal
> Minds, have to cover their
> actual intentions in either
> "religious" lies or else in
> "nationalistic" or other
> "political" lies, that the
> journalists will push into
> our throats and inflict upon
> our eyes as "the reasons"
> and "the motives," that are
> however
>
> given solely to cover up THE
> INTENTION to DOMINATE us or
> to EXTERMINATE life, our
> life, and so
>
> we are kept intensely stupid and
> we are continuously and actively
> made ignorant, again and again,
> of the basic fact of life on
> Earth:
>
> '
> (as I tried to explain to you in
> a work of true philosophy, a
> masterpiece of collecting and
> integrating the facts of history
> indeed with an intense love for
> people, as no one has ever done
> before but that should have been
> done, a milestone of thinking,
> called
>
> 'The Nature of War' *(10)
>
> with which I was explaining to
> you, that war exists and exists
> ONLY, because)
>
> '
>
> "the people" are not 'the people' at all - if
> you permit that simple kind of wording - BUT
> 'the people' are consisting of two violently,
> bitterly and forever OPPOSED categories,
>
> which "the wisest of all" and "the very
> Divine" and "the perfect or Enlightened"
> or "the spiritually advanced Holinesses"
> either hide the truth of, or they make
> the reversal of the truth seem "true,"
>
> and often their whole "philosophy"
> exists only IN ORDER TO hide, to
> 'reverse' and
>
> they DENY the truth of and certainly
> they DESTROY the truth of (the fact,
> that the society does consist of these
> two and violently opposed categories of
> people):
>
> '
>
> The former (first) category - Criminal Minds -
>
> living on Earth "cures" Criminal Minds,
> according to Criminal Minds who want to
> be accepted as "the wisest" and even as
> "most divine,"
>
> they say or imply, that 'living on
> Earth "cures" Criminal Minds,'
>
> of course, these claim also,
> that "there are no Criminal
> Minds, only 'un-evolved
> souls', 'who still are
> materialistic' or who 'do
> not yet know the difference
> between good and evil,'
> etc.,"
>
> they say or imply, that 'living on
> Earth "cures" "the people",'
>
> especially if "the people" follow
> 'four noble paths with eight folds
> in it' - to be "cured"
>
> from something that can not be cured in
> them at all, and that they do not want
> to be cured from, and that nobody ever
> has cured them from, not since all
> eternity *(8)
>
> (indeed,in practical terms, it is
> since eternity, that the damage
> has been inflicted permanently
> into their soul - having become
> a Criminal Mind, having been made
> to ENJOY evil, and to fiercely
> protect that what for THEM IS
> joy - *(8))
>
> '
>
> and on the other hand, there is the vast
> majority, the latter (the second) category,
> you and me included
>
> - "to be 'cured'," again according to
> "the wisest and most divine," to be
> cured, but from something WE do not
> have, but, which anyway "will be
> cured," "will be cured automatically,"
> even,
>
> "in 6000 life times," or "in one
> fell swoop," (suddenly, in one
> time)
>
> '
>
> and both categories, "the people," "by living
> on Earth," are "to be cured" from something,
>
> THAT ONLY one category, the first category
> - the severely Criminal one percent of the
> population - DOES suffer from BUT suffers
> INCURABLY from,
>
> as a condition of their soul, and
>
> that WE, the remaining ninety-nine percent,
> DO NOT AT ALL HAVE NOR SUFFER FROM, AND THAT
> WE NEVER HAD AND NEVER WILL HAVE
>
> as a condition of our soul,
>
> even when we are at times immersed in the
> ENERGIES (ideas, feelings, intentions) of
> those one percent, the first category, the
> Criminal Minds.
>
> The ENERGIES are not the soul, however,
>
> though also that fact has yet to be
> discovered by the "very Divine" and the
> "very Enlightened and other Holinesses,"
> from the New Age which is just a front
> for Buddhism and Hinduism. *(8)
>
> But Criminal Minds want to convince and
> "educate" everyone, that "people are all
> equal,"
>
> "except for those telling you they
> are Divine and Holy, and superior,
> Enlightened" - or "evolved far
> beyond us, spiritually," some
> even "by 8000 years" or some other
> fancy number,
>
> meaning with it actually, that "YOU are
> the Criminal Mind," "you may be cured,
> or at least live pleasantly, IF you are
> doing as you are told, AND feeling that
> AND 'perceiving' that, what you are told
> and expected to (feel and 'perceive'),"
>
> meaning with it actually, that "THEY" -
> the Criminal Minds - not only "are the
> normal people," but "are superior to
> everyone"
>
> - as you see it in all dictatorships and
> in all dictatorial "sciences" and in
> all dictatorial "religions," and even
> in "art" from Criminal Minds.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Towards most men - to me, and, if you happen to be a man, also
> towards you - it is just a straightforward insult, when a woman
> wants to show you or is forced to show you, that "she has to
> control your 'bestial desires'."
>
> The faithful reader understands, that I am
> talking about absolute truth,
>
> according to which it is an insult to an
> honest man, to treat him as one would treat
> a malicious thief,
>
> and according to the same absolute truth, it
> is an insult in particular to honest and
> caring people, to NOT respect, that a serial
> murderer, like Putin or Hu Jintao or Jiang
> Zemin, IS such an individual as he ACTUALLY
> is,
>
> REGARDLESS of whether he is or
> is NOT (or is not publicly)
> recognized as such,
>
> because truth IS absolute:
>
> Of course, what is there, is there, also
> when it is not seen or not understood as
> to what it is
>
> - but Criminal Minds OF COURSE
> oppose that -
>
> and, it is also detrimental to yourself and to
> people who depend on you, when you do NOT
> respect
>
> (when you do not look and see correctly,
> when you do not recognize)
>
> the condition and intentions of people who
> are Criminal Minds. *(2)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> On top of that insult, the girls and women are taught - either
> directly, or by implying it - the ATROCIOUS LIE, that
>
> "most men are evil," AND THE LIE, that
>
> "a person who is close family, 'BY DEFINITION' is NOT evil,"
>
> and that it is women, who "must control men's bestial
> desires,"
>
> and that men must be dominated also by the manner in which
> women dress - in this case, by women covering anything
>
> "that could remind men of ''Sacks',' yes, even when
> it could remind men of the Beauty of women ...which
> would again unleash his bestial desires"
>
> - a very repulsive and very destructive lie, as
> promoted by Criminal Minds who do, of course,
> only TALK ABOUT THEMSELVES when they claim to be
> talking "about others."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> The practice of hiding the body's beauty from sight, is a
> straightforward denial of the spiritual nature of life, (*)
> in this way too:
>
> YOU FEEL people, because you are a spirit, a soul, and
> because others are a spirit, a soul - and this has
> nothing at all to do with the clothing worn,
>
> unless you are in a culture where 'Sacks' (the
> spiritual Energy of 'Sacks') is heavily denied to
> exist, and thus
>
> where the senses are supposed to be those of the
> eyes and ears and smell and touch only:
>
> WITHOUT feeling or seeing the soul of another
> - which means -
>
> without Love, without Understanding, without Responsibility or
> Care for another. *(3)
>
> '
>
> '
>
> A normal man or boy FEELS how women or girls feel, and equally,
> a normal woman or girl does FEEL how men or boys feel
>
> - and that has nothing at all to do, of course, with
> whether these are dressed or not, or whether they are
> in another room, or whether they are married or not:
>
> You still FEEL them, simply by the fact of your being
> alive, and by the fact of their being alive; spiritual
> Energy knows no distance, and no walls.
>
> '
>
> But DENYING that, is the behavior of animals - and even animals
> usually are not that stupid - to refuse to know, that they are
> entirely spiritual (Energetic) in nature, but
>
> by DENYING that, you would also be refusing to act in accordance
> with your own nature - which IS entirely spiritual:
>
> People are souls, and they feel and think as souls, which
> IS done spiritually, of course.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> If you DENY that, that people are souls and that life consists
> entirely of feelings (if you know that you FEEL thoughts and
> perceptions and intentions and memories - but if you deny all
> that)
>
> then normal men, of decent nature, are indeed told to behave
> like animals, also towards women:
>
> They may start to prevent women from showing their Beauty
> in public, and (to prevent women) from using their many
> (other) talents to enhance and enliven and protect the
> society; and instead,
>
> they may develop customs of locking their wives up in
> their houses, and to forbid women to take part in social
> life, to BE alive:
>
> to decide ONESELF with whom to talk and whom not,
>
> and - most important of all - to decide about one's
> OWN feelings and with whom to share these and where
> and when, which - the most precious thing in all of
> life -
>
> is DESTROYED,
>
> when Criminal Minds start to claim, that (except for them-
> selves of course) "everyone has bestial desires" which
> must be blocked, prevented, supervised and lied about,
>
> and "therefore, to maintain and guard their own decency, women
> have to block the 'bestial desires' of men."
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Which is - if you like - the automatic and indeed the historic
> 'retaliation,' 'backlash' or 'back firing' from enforcing the
> ugly lie, the very destructive lie, on men and women and on
> children, that
>
> "women must be dominated" - "else they will be evil to
> men."
>
> And as there is already that heavy agreement on
> being dominated, on "people have to be dominated,
> else they will be evil"
>
> - while exactly the OPPOSITE is true:
>
> When people are NOT dominated, THEN they are
> NOT evil,
>
> when free, THEN they create and exert their
> care and their love and their responsibility
> for others, already, yes, ESPECIALLY as
> children -
>
> but if there is already a solid, social
> agreement, that
>
> "all people must be dominated," "must do
> as they are told," and "children must
> 'learn' that, as soon as possible,"
>
> then (not only the women, but) the men are ALSO
> easily dominated,
>
> which you see in such countries and societies,
>
> the men are acting like sheep, dressed and
> talking and behaving all alike, as if they
> are spineless sheep, conforming to whoever
> is dominating,
>
> and they are showing, and eager to show in
> public, by their dress and hairdo (their hair
> style), even by hiding their own Beauty, that
>
> "they do as they are told,"
>
> which is the "definition" of "morality"
> of the Destructive Coward, as described
> elsewhere.
>
> '
>
> '
>
> If you trace these customs back in history, you will find some
> Criminal Minds, who - being Criminal Minds - intended to destroy
> the religion they were part of *(6) and
>
> who intended to prevent people from feeling and from expressing and
> from sharing
>
> the tremendous, tremendous love people naturally and natively
> have for each other.
>
> '
>
> Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
> human rights philosopher and poet
>
> 'Men of all nations came
> to listen to Solomon's wisdom,
> sent by all the kings of the world,
> who had heard of his wisdom.'
>
> 1 Kings 4:34
>
> ______________________
> Edited and Quoted from:
>
> (*) ' 'Sacks' In Any Religion (definition of 'Sacks')'
> {HRI 20060521-V1.4.1-UAA}
> (21 May 2006 - Version 1.4.1-UAA on 9 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.education/msg/673b717cde49ed54
> '
>
> ________
> See also:
>
> 'Plato On Making Love - And Defining Loneliness' *(3)
>
> 'About 'Sacks'ual Orientation' *(4)
>
> 'Islamic Women Allowed Four Husbands (For Equal Rights)'
> - Edited Quote from {HRI 20070226-V4.2}
> (11 March 2007 - Version 3.0 on 12 March 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.men/msg/93410f41975030b1
> '
> ________
> Textnote:
>
> (a) Any sane person knows, that both men AND women have exactly NOT
> to be suppressed, in order to develop their nature,
>
> which IS to love people, to love life and to create beauty
> in life and to provide joy for each other.
>
> Anything opposed to that, is the nature of the Criminal
> Mind, and of people who have taken to (have been
> overwhelmed by) the Criminal mind-set
>
> from which Christianity suffered considerably in its
> Dark Ages.
>
> _________
> Footnotes:
>
> (1) 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty'
> {HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1}
> (7 Mar 2003 - Version 2.1 on 17 Oct 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/4129fa4f1a67840e
>
> (2) 'Rights of Criminal Minds'
> {HRI 20040108-V1.0.1}
> (8 January 2004 - Version 1.0.1 on 12 Nov 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/2d74f7c389973d14
>
> (3) 'Plato On Making Love - And Defining Loneliness'
> {HRI 20041114-V2.0.2}
> (14 November 2004 - Version 2.0.2 on 29 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/a8326be589085802
> {HRI 20041114-V2.0-UAA}
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.education/msg/ebdd8f227dd037e2
>
> (4) 'About 'Sacks'ual Orientation'
> {HRI 20050619}
> (19 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology/msg/8b802829a1da95d8
>
> (5) 'Religious Freedom - (Definition for Human Rights enforcement)'
> {HRI 20030407-3-V1.0.1}
> (7 April 2003 - Issue 3 - Version 1.0.1 on 6 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/9308443aa2e9bf31
>
> '
>
> (6) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Introduction: Life
> Forms'
> {HRI 20010829-pi1-V1.1.1}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 1 Version 1.1.1 on 11 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/88a7a7b2d830d5e6
>
> (p2) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Introduction: Our
> Planet'
> {HRI 20010829-pi2-V1.2}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 2 Version 1.2 on 12 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/06119c3448d82941
>
> (p3) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - The Denial'
> {HRI 20010829-pi3-V1.2}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 3 Version 1.2 on 13 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/2c7d720f49c84375
>
> (p4) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
> - Some Fine Particle Physics' {HRI 20010829-pi4-V3.0}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 4 Version 3.0 on 14 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/c99ab8c8bdd57a1c
>
> (p5) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
> - The Nature Of The Physical Universe' {HRI 20010829-pi5-V3.2.1}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 5 Version 3.2.1 on 18 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/f433f1aa6f29a904
>
> (p6) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
> - Opposing The Nature Of The Creation' {HRI 20010829-pi6-V4.3.1}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 6 Version 4.3.1 on 27 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/2978c2606a0953c0
>
> (p7) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
> - Life Energy Particles And Your Body' {HRI 20010829-pi7-V2.1}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 7 Version 2.1 on 28 Sep 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/bd8c8b7f79027767
>
> (p8) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Life Energy Particles
> - Perception And Motion' {HRI 20010829-pi8-V1.3.1}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 8 Version 1.3.1 on 9 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/50b5bc5307f3fdf1
>
> (p9) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Life Energy Particles
> - Perception At A Distance' {HRI 20010829-pi9-V3.0}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 9 Version 3.0 on 11 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/507d3a77159c02fe
>
> (p10)'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Content Of Life Energy
> Particles - Mechanics of Deception {HRI 20010829-pi10-V2.3}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 10 Version 2.3 on 22 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/6e9224264ec0595c
>
> (p11)'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Certainty of Perception'
> {HRI 20010829-pi11-V2.0}
> (29 August 2001 - part issue 11 Version 2.0 on 30 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/1d8d3f2a78ab95fe
>
> '
>
> (7) 'Obviously The Second Law of Human Rights'
> {HRI 20060924}
> (24 September 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/114acdcfb40a7962
>
> (8) 'Penetrating and Exposing Hinduism and Buddhism'
> {HRI 20060816-V5.0}
> (16 August 2006 - Version 5.0 on 1 Nov 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/ccbd175e3fca1cdc
>
> (9) 'The First Law of Human Rights'
> {HRI 20060601-V2.2.2}
> (1 June 2006 - Version 2.2.2 on 8 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/3b9985c64f1287f1
>
> (10) 'The Nature of War'
> {HRI 20051027-V1.6.1}
> (27 Oct 2005 - Version 1.6.1 on 19 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/Koos-Nolst-Trenite/msg/c2aec579d9970be6
>
> (11) 'True Love Loves - 'Sacks' In Any Religion, and Definition
> of 'Sacks' '
> {HRI 20060521-V2.0.2-UAA}
> (21 May 2006 - Version 2.0.2-UAA on 26 March 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/5c94910c64f57cdf
> '
>
> ____________
> Verification:
>
>
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
>
> Copyright 2006, 2007 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
> and poet
> This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
> anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
> who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
> to others who might be able to learn from it.
> None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
> or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
> encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
> about any organizations or individuals.
> Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
> PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
> (address unreadable for Internet robots
> - replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)