(citered efter canadafirst.net)
China's War Plans for Conquest & Extermination of North America
The following chilling speech by Chinese Defence Minister Chi Haotian
was first carried August 12 by U.S broadcaster Hal Turner. It is a
chilling but coherent plan for war,. It explains that China needs more
space and resources for its soaring population. It offers a vision of
Chinese racial superiority and entitlement to regional, if not world,
hegemony. It calls for the conquest of North America, already once
conquered by Asians [the Native Indians] and the extermination of at
least half of North America's population, preferably by a
still-to-be-perfected biological weapon that targets Caucasians .
I've sat on this frightening call for war and genocide for seven
months. I talked to Hal Turner at the recent American Renaissance
Conference in Herndon, VA. He said American friends of his had obtained
it from dissident Chinese military men in Shanghai. Another old China
hand has since confirmed that the speech is widely known in China. It
has been published in a few dissident outlets including Epoch Times. As
usual, the poodle press does nothing but spin more fantasies about the
huge profits that might be reaped somewhere in the future through more
trade with China. Like the sorry old opium addict, they continue to
"chase the dragon." -- Paul Fromm
Chi Haotian, China's Minister of Defence and Vice-Chairman of China's
Central Military Commission, gave the following speech to his military
leadership. ... In it, he spoke openly about China's need for "more
living space" and stated bluntly that The United States, Canada and
Australia are the only places large enough to accommodate future
Chinese needs. He notes the need for a quick, effective biological
attack upon the U.S. to depopulate it as a prelude to conquest, and
plainly states that China is working on genetic bio-weapons to kill
everyone except 'yellow people.' His chilling remarks boast of a recent
survey of the Chinese public wherein upwards of eighty percent (80%)
were willing to 'shoot and kill women, children and prisoners of war'
as part of such an effort.
More frightening was his admission of an ongoing deliberate deception
of the U.S., with China portraying itself as a peaceful business
partner, while actually planning to kill 'one or two hundred million
Americans.'
He also notes that, thanks to trade, income from Chinese exports is
providing the financing needed to vastly expand Chinese military might
in preparation for an attack upon the U.S. which he seems to indicate
will occur within "five to ten years." -- Hal Turner
Comrades, I'm very excited today, because the large-scale online survey
sina.com that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite
promising and our Party's cause will be carried on. In answering the
question, "Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war,"
more than 80 per cent of the respondents answered in the affirmative,
exceeding by far our expectations.
Today I'd like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online
survey among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last
time, during which I started with a discussion of the issue of the
three islands [Taiwan, Diaoyu Islands and the Spratley Islands],
mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic theme of 'peace and development'
had come to an end, and concluded that modernization under the sabre
is the only option for China's next phase. I also mentioned we have a
vital stake overseas.
The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot
at women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes
far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what
the Chinese people's attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers
do not hesitate to kill even non-combatants, they'll naturally be
doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants. Therefore, the
responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude
people have towards war. ... . We wanted to know: If China's global
development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will
our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it? ...
The fact is, our 'development' refers to the great revitalization of
the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we
have now but also includes the whole world. ... As everybody knows,
according to the views propagated by the Western scholars, humanity as
a whole originated from one single mother in Africa. Therefore, no race
can claim racial superiority. However, according to the research
conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from
other races on earth. We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we
originated independently in the land of China. ... Therefore, we can
assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million
years, civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an
ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of
two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself,
'descendants of Yan and Huang.' ...
During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the
Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians
in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific.
We all know that on account of our national superiority, during the
thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization was at the peak
of the world. We were the centre of the world civilization, and no
other civilization in the world was comparable to ours. Later on,
because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure
of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the
centre of the world shifted to the West.
In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the centre of the world
civilization shift back to China? ... Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing
made similar points in early 1980s. Based on an historical analysis, he
pointed out that the centre of world civilization is shifting. It
shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States;
now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th
Century as the British Century, and the 20th century as the American
Century, then the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century. ...
Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally,
our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history,
more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us
with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great
unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave
us these heritages. These two heritages determined that we have a
stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race
has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined 'not to be
buried by either heaven or earth' no matter how severe the natural,
man-made, and national disasters. This is our advantage.
Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United States
remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland. Once its
enemies aim at the mainland, the enemies would have already reached
Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the
president to declare war. But for us, we don't waste time on these
trivial things. ...
Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to
further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China
and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to
God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us? If
the common people don't believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified
leader, question his authority, and want to monitor him, if the
religious followers in our society question why we are leading God in
churches, can our Party continue to rule China?
The first issue is living space. This is the biggest focus of the
revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the
fight over basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the
source of the vast majority of wars in history. This may change in the
information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita resources are
much less than those of Germany's back then. In addition, economic
development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative impact, and
climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very
short supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of
soil, water, and air. Not only our ability to sustain and develop our
race, but even its survival is gravely threatened, to a degree much
greater than faced Germany back then.
Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space
is much better than ours. They have forests alongside the highways,
while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue
with white clouds, while our sky is covered with a layer of dark haze.
Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even our ground
water is so polluted that it can't be drunk without filtering. They
have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a
small residential building; in contrast, our streets are always
crawling with people, and several people have to share one room.
Many years ago, there was a book titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said
that, due to our following the American style of consumption, our
limited resources would no longer support the population and society
would collapse, once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our
population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on
imports to sustain our nation. It's not that we haven't paid attention
to this issue. The Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this
issue.
But the term 'living space' (lebensraum) is too closely related to Nazi
Germany. The reason we don't want to discuss this too openly is to
avoid the West's association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in
turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our
emphasis on He Xin's new theory, 'Human rights are just living rights,'
we only talk about 'living,' but not 'space,' so as to avoid using the
term 'living space.' From the perspective of history, the reason that
China is faced with the issue of living space is because Western
countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries
established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves
an advantage on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we
must lead the Chinese people outside of China, so that they could
develop outside of China. ....
Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space?
First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us
to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries! Second,
even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even
Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only
countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast
land to serve our need for mass colonization.
Therefore, solving the 'issue of America' is the key to solving all
other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to have many people
migrate there and even establish another China under the same
leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the
ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the White
race. We the descendant of the Chinese nation are entitled to the
possession of the land! .... It is historical destiny that China and
United States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path
and fight ... In the long run, the relationship of China and the
United States is one of a life-and-death struggle. ... Of course, right
now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and
opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and
technology. We still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we
can to promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all
aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our country. ...
Only by using special means to 'clean up' America will we be able to
lead the Chinese people there. ... Only by using non-destructive
weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America
for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological
technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another.
Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the
opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving
our purpose of ' cleaning up' America all of a sudden. When Comrade
Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the
perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier
groups and focus instead on developing lethal weapons that can
eliminate mass populations of the enemy country. ...
Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the
Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese
people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is
bound to take place. According to the computation of the author of
Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure
would be more than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our
yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the
official figure of th population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow
land has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who knows how soon
it will come, the great collapse will occur any time and more than half
of the population will have to go. ...
It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But
that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in
which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do
not want deaths. But if history confronts us with a choice between
deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we'd have to pick the latter,
as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese
people and the life of our Party. ... The last problem I want to talk
about is of firmly seizing the preparations for military battle. ...
The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the United States
problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved.
Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan,
but in fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far
beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites. Marxism
pointed out that violence is the midwife for the birth of the new
society. Therefore war is the midwife for the birth of China's century.
--
>.)
Unter blinden ist der einäugige könig.
http://worldimprover.net/
islam-info:
http://www.historyofjihad.org/ - WICHTIG / IMPORTANT