Scotius <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2006 05:55:18 -0800, "PaperBoy"
> <stormrider_2007@operamail.com> wrote:
>
Sikke dog en slem gang propagandistisk løgn og lakrids. Hvor har du det
dog fra? Man skal sør'me lægge øjne til meget vrøvl i denne gruppe.
erl.
> >The jewish supremacists have a long-term, publicly-declared aim of
> >creating a 3rd world war between muslim countries and the west. As part
> >of this, they want the USA, AUS and UK to attack Iran and Syria.
> >
> >The American, Australian and British governments have been sorted, but
> >they need the support of the people. Unfortunately more and more people
> >are turning against our involvement in the middle east. The people of
> >continental Europe are even more against it. The jews therefore need to
> >manufacture outrage against islam.
> >
> >In September 2005 a jewish editor in Denmark with links to American
> >neo-cons, Flemming Rose, asks cartoonists to send in anti-muslim
> >cartoons. When they are published, nothing happens.
> >
> >In the meantime, the jewish prime minister of France, Sarkozy, stirs up
> >muslims by calling them 'scum' and saying they deserve to be treated
> >like animals, after two youths were killed while running from the
> >police. Riots follow.
> >
> >Four months after they were published, the Danish cartoons are
> >reprinted at exactly the same time by newspapers all over Europe. The
> >French paper France-Soir is the first to publish all 12 cartoons. The
> >decision to publish was made by the jewish editor Arnaud Levy.
> >
> >The International Herald Tribune asked the Jewish editor of the Danish
> >newspaper at the Flemming Rose whether he would publish cartoons
> >attacking Ariel Sharon and Israel. He replied "that could be construed
> >as racist."
> >
> >
http://mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=508448
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Jyllands-Posten, the Danish newspaper that first published the cartoons
> >of
> >the prophet Muhammad that have caused a storm of protest throughout the
> >
> >Islamic world, REFUSED TO PUBISH DRAWINGS LAMPOONING JESUS CHRIST, it
> >has
> >emerged today.
> >
> >The Danish daily turned down the cartoons of Christ three years ago, on
> >the
> >grounds that they could be offensive to readers and were not funny.
> >
> >In April 2003, Danish illustrator Christoffer Zieler submitted a series
> >of
> >unsolicited cartoons dealing with the resurrection of Christ to
> >Jyllands-Posten.
> >
> >Zieler received an email back from the paper's Sunday editor, Jens
> >Kaiser,
> >which said: "I don't think Jyllands-Posten's readers will enjoy the
> >drawings. As a matter of fact, I think that they will provoke an
> >outcry.
> >Therefore, I will not use them."
> >
> >The illustrator told the Norwegian daily Dagbladet, which saw the
> >email: "I
> >see the cartoons as an innocent joke, of the type that my Christian
> >grandfather would enjoy."
> >
> >"I showed them to a few pastors and they thought they were funny."
> >
> >He said that he felt Jyllands-Posten rated the feelings of its
> >Christian
> >readers higher than that of its Muslim readers.
> >
> >But the Jyllands-Posten editor in question, Mr Kaiser, told
> >MediaGuardian.co.uk that the case was "ridiculous to bring forward now.
> >It
> >has nothing to do with the Muhammad cartoons.
> >
> >"In the Muhammad drawings case, we asked the illustrators to do it. I
> >did
> >not ask for these cartoons. That's the difference," he said.
> >
> >"The illustrator thought his cartoons were funny. I did not think so.
> >It
> >would offend some readers, not much but some."
> >
> >The decision smacks of "double-standards", said Ahmed Akkari, spokesman
> >for
> >the Danish-based European Committee for Prophet Honouring, the umbrella
> >
> >group that represents 27 Muslim organisations that are campaigning for
> >a
> >full apology from Jyllands-Posten.
> >
> >"How can Jyllands-Posten distinguish the two cases? Surely they must
> >understand," Mr Akkari added.
>
> You're a neo nazi. What are you doing posting to
> alt.religion.islam, etc?